Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft a CEP for conda Plugins Standards and Best Practices #33

Open
beeankha opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Draft a CEP for conda Plugins Standards and Best Practices #33

beeankha opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@beeankha
Copy link
Member

beeankha commented Jul 29, 2022

With all of the upcoming plugins work and the possibilities related to them, it would be beneficial to come up with a core set of standards and best practices that have been discussed and agreed upon.

Possible topics to discuss include:

  • Versioning
  • Terminology
  • Tests
  • Verbosity / debug output
  • Output format
  • Preserving certain conda CLI arguments (e.g., -n, -p, -c, etc.)

Note: Standards that would only apply to certain plugins (e.g., a solver or authentication plugin) may be discussed within a separate CEP for those particular plugins.

@AlbertDeFusco
Copy link

One thing I've been thinking about is that it may be considered best practice to not change important conda CLI arguments like -n, -p. and potentially others. That's not to say that all plugins have to work with named envs and conda env prefixes, but it would be best if plugins did not implement those flags that then change their meaning, which would lead to user confusion.

@beeankha
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for those details, @AlbertDeFusco! I'll be sure to include that in the upcoming CEP; I also updated the list above in the issue description. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants