-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional potential race condition on os.Readdir #23587
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
We were not able to find or create Copr project
Unless the HTTP status code above is >= 500, please check your configuration for:
|
@Luap99 @edsantiago Searched for all os.Readdir in code base and only found this one other instance, where we have a potential race condition. |
Good proactive thinking, thanks. I can't comment on the safety of this patch, but FWIW the string "Deallocating lock" does not appear in my multi-year archive of flake logs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This touches file locks abstraction that we are not using anywhere in our testing because we default to the shm based locks. So that code was never called. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, rhatdan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
936455d
into
containers:main
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?