Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

play kube: fix segfault #3958

Merged

Conversation

haircommander
Copy link
Collaborator

when securityContext wasn't specified in yaml.
add a test as well

fixes: #3956

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt pehunt@redhat.com

when securityContext wasn't specified in yaml.
add a test as well

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 6, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 6, 2019
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 6, 2019

Sure, LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 6, 2019

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8898085 into containers:master Sep 6, 2019
if containerYAML.SecurityContext.Privileged != nil {
containerConfig.Privileged = *containerYAML.SecurityContext.Privileged
}
if containerYAML.SecurityContext != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could have made this a lot simpler by combining these two if commands on same line.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for some reason, the AllowPRivilegeEscalation check was outside of the containerConfig.SecurityOpts check, so doing it this way maintained the branch structure. I didn't know enough about why that happened to choose to change it

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

play kube cause panic
6 participants