Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disruptor-proxy for ActiveObjects #18

Closed
sirinath opened this issue Aug 1, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Disruptor-proxy for ActiveObjects #18

sirinath opened this issue Aug 1, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@sirinath
Copy link

sirinath commented Aug 1, 2020

Can an equivalent of disruptor-proxy be added? Ideally much faster if possible.

@jac18281828
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds like an interesting challenge. On a side note, Conversant Disruptor is already using a BlockingQueue so it should be very easy to plug into your project or business logic. Try the MultithreadConcurrentQueue.

@sirinath
Copy link
Author

sirinath commented Sep 7, 2020

I mean can this functionality also be added to this project so any code using disruptor-proxy can be migrated to conversant-disruptor easily.

@jac18281828
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as dormant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants