refactor(core,stf,x)!: remove InvokeTyped from router #21224
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes involve a reorganization of dependencies across various modules through updates to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant MsgRouterService
participant Keeper
participant Msg
Keeper->>MsgRouterService: Invoke(ctx, msg)
MsgRouterService-->>Keeper: Return execution result
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
C:x/staking
C:x/gov
C:x/auth
C:x/evidence
C:x/upgrade
C:x/authz
C:x/group
C:server/v2
|
Looks like I messed up something in x/accounts. I can check that on monday (want to focus on other things tomorrow) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (10)
simapp/mint_fn.go (4)
33-40: Improve error handling for unexpected response types.The error handling for unexpected response types is clear and provides useful feedback. However, consider logging the error for better traceability in production environments.
- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp) + k.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)
42-49: Ensure consistent error handling across service invocations.The error handling pattern is consistent across different service invocations, which is good for maintainability. However, consider logging errors for better traceability.
- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp) + k.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)
53-60: Maintain consistency in error handling for type assertions.The error handling for type assertions is consistent with previous segments. Ensure that this pattern is followed throughout the codebase for uniformity.
- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp) + k.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)
62-70: Enhance error logging for unexpected response types.For better debugging and traceability, consider logging the error message when the response type is unexpected.
- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp) + k.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go (1)
76-83: Enhance error handling for unexpected response types.The error handling for unexpected response types is clear and provides useful feedback. Consider logging the error for better traceability in production environments.
- return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp) + k.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)) + return fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", resp)x/group/go.mod (1)
193-193: Local path in replace directive does not existThe local path specified in the replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockupdoes not exist. Please verify if this path is correct and intended for development or testing purposes. Adjust the path or create the necessary directory if required.
- Line 193 in
x/group/go.mod:cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockup => ../accounts/defaults/lockupAnalysis chain
Verify the local path for the replace directive.
The replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockuppoints to a local path. Ensure that this path is correct and intended for development or testing purposes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correct usage of the local path in replace directive. # Test: Check if the local path exists. Expect: Path should exist. test -d ../accounts/defaults/lockup && echo "Path exists" || echo "Path does not exist"Length of output: 86
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (2)
Inconsistent usage of
accountstd.ExecModulefound.The function
accountstd.ExecModuleis used inlockup.go, whileaccountstd.ExecModuleAnysis used inmultisig/account.go. This suggests an inconsistency that may need further investigation to ensure the correct function is used in each context.
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go: Usesaccountstd.ExecModule.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account.go: Usesaccountstd.ExecModuleAnys.Please verify whether the usage of different functions is intentional or if it requires alignment.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
390-395: LGTM! Verify consistent usage ofaccountstd.ExecModule.The change to use
accountstd.ExecModuleimproves type safety. Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `accountstd.ExecModule`. # Test: Search for `accountstd.ExecModule` usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'accountstd.ExecModule'Length of output: 286
540-550: Ensure Consistent Use of Type Assertions in Functions UsingQueryModule.While the type assertion in the reviewed function improves error handling, other functions using
QueryModulelack similar assertions. Consistency in applying this pattern will enhance robustness across the codebase.
- Review functions using
QueryModuleto ensure they include appropriate type assertions.Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify type assertion for similar functions.
The type assertion ensures the response is of the expected type, improving error handling.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify type assertion for similar functions. # Test: Search for functions using `QueryModule` and check for type assertions. Expect: Proper type assertions. rg --type go 'QueryModule' -A 5Length of output: 207205
x/staking/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
72-80: Inconsistent Response Type Handling Across MethodsThe type assertion for response handling, as seen in the reviewed snippet, is not consistently applied across similar methods using the
Invokefunction. This may lead to unexpected behavior if the response type is not as expected.
- Consider reviewing and updating similar methods to include type assertions for enhanced robustness.
Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify response type handling in similar methods.
The type assertion ensures the response is of the expected type, enhancing robustness.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify response type handling in similar methods. # Test: Search for methods using `Invoke` and check for type assertions. Expect: Proper type assertions. rg --type go 'Invoke' -A 5Length of output: 216056
660-668: Inconsistent Use of Type Assertions AfterInvokeCallsThe review of
Invokemethod usage across the codebase reveals that type assertions are not consistently applied. This can lead to runtime errors if the response type is unexpected. It is recommended to review and apply type assertions where necessary to ensure robust error handling.
- Files to Review:
x/authz/tx.pb.gox/upgrade/types/tx.pb.gox/upgrade/types/query.pb.gox/staking/keeper/msg_server.goPlease ensure that type assertions are used consistently after
Invokecalls to handle potential type mismatches.Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify type assertion for similar methods.
The type assertion ensures the response is of the expected type, improving error handling.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify type assertion for similar methods. # Test: Search for methods using `Invoke` and check for type assertions. Expect: Proper type assertions. rg --type go 'Invoke' -A 5Length of output: 216056
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/accounts/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/group/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (39)
- core/router/service.go (1 hunks)
- runtime/router.go (4 hunks)
- runtime/router_test.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (3 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/mint_fn.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/mock/types_module_module.go (2 hunks)
- types/module/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/account_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/accountstd/test_util.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/base/account.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/base/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/keeper.go (7 hunks)
- x/auth/ante/setup.go (1 hunks)
- x/auth/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/auth/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/auth/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/auth/vesting/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/authz/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (2 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (1 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- x/upgrade/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- x/auth/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go
- x/auth/types/expected_keepers.go
- x/auth/vesting/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (33)
core/router/service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/accountstd/test_util.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.runtime/router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/base/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/auth/ante/setup.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/account_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"runtime/router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/upgrade/keeper/abci.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.simapp/mint_fn.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/evidence/keeper/infraction.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/defaults/base/account.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/gov/keeper/abci.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/auth/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"testutil/mock/types_module_module.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/authz/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/staking/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.types/module/module.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (57)
core/router/service.go (1)
14-15: Consolidation of Invoke methods is effective.The consolidation of
InvokeTypedandInvokeUntypedinto a singleInvokemethod simplifies the interface and aligns with the goal of reducing redundancy. The updated method signature is clear and follows the Uber Golang style guide.Ensure that all implementations of the
Serviceinterface correctly handle the newInvokemethod signature.x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (1)
19-19: Method renaming aligns with interface changes.Renaming
InvokeUntypedtoInvokeinmockRouterServicealigns with the updatedServiceinterface. The internal logic remains unchanged, ensuring compatibility with existing tests.x/accounts/accountstd/test_util.go (1)
7-7: Simplification and aliasing improve clarity.The removal of the
moduleExecUntypedparameter fromNewMockContextsimplifies the function signature. Aliasing thetestingpackage ascoretestingenhances clarity and readability.server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (1)
42-43: LGTM! But verify the impact of removingTestMerge.The update to test the
Invokemethod is approved.However, ensure that the removal of
TestMergedoes not negatively affect test coverage for merge-related functionality.Verification successful
Test coverage for merge functionality remains sufficient.
The removal of
TestMergeinstf_router_test.godoes not negatively affect the overall test coverage, as there are multiple other tests covering merge functionality in different parts of the codebase.
store/types/store_test.go:TestTraceContext_Mergestore/cachekv/store_test.go: Several tests related to merge iteratorssimapp/app_test.go:TestMergedRegistryScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `TestMerge` on test coverage. # Test: Search for other tests covering merge functionality. Expect: Other tests should cover merge functionality. rg --type go 'func Test.*Merge'Length of output: 647
server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go (2)
31-33: UnifiedInvokemethod simplifies invocation process.The consolidation of
InvokeTypedandInvokeUntypedinto a singleInvokemethod enhances maintainability and reduces complexity.
50-55: UnifiedInvokemethod enhances query invocation.The changes align with the consolidation strategy, improving clarity and reducing complexity.
x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (1)
Line range hint
40-60:
SimplifiedcoinsTransferMsgFuncimproves clarity.The reduction to a single message return type streamlines the function's interface, enhancing usability.
runtime/router_test.go (4)
40-42: Ensure error messages are clear and informative.The error message in the test case for an invalid message is clear and specifies the issue with finding the response type. This is good practice for debugging.
56-57: Ensure consistency in error handling for queries.The test case for an invalid query uses the
Invokemethod and checks for a specific error message. This maintains consistency in error handling across message and query tests.
Line range hint
60-67:
Check the coverage of the valid query test.The test case for a valid query uses the
Invokemethod and verifies the response. Ensure that this test covers all necessary scenarios for valid queries.
44-49: Verify the correctness of the valid message test.The test case for a valid message correctly uses the
Invokemethod and checks for a non-nil response. Ensure that this test covers all necessary scenarios for valid messages.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (3)
22-22: Simplify parameter handling inMakeAccountContext.The removal of unnecessary
nilparameters simplifies the function call, making the code cleaner and easier to read.
58-65: Clarify the return type inQueryModule.The change to explicitly return a
ProtoMsgenhances clarity regarding the expected output. This is a good practice for improving type safety and understanding.
47-52: Verify the unification ofExecModulefunctionality.The change to use
ExecModuleinstead ofExecModuleUntypedsuggests a unification of functionality. Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended behavior differences.Verification successful
Unification of
ExecModulefunctionality verified successfully.The unification of
ExecModulefunctionality appears consistent across the codebase. The test case incontext_test.gospecifically verifies its behavior, ensuring no unintended differences were introduced.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the unification of `ExecModule` functionality does not introduce unintended behavior. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `ExecModule` to ensure consistent behavior. rg --type go "ExecModule" -A 5Length of output: 5162
x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (1)
48-48: Enhance type safety withInvoke.The change to use
Invokeinstead ofInvokeUntypedlikely enhances type safety in message processing. Ensure that this change does not affect the functionality of message execution.x/accounts/defaults/base/utils_test.go (2)
61-64: Enhance test utility by returning a response message.The change to return a
ProtoMsgalongside an error in the anonymous function enhances the test utility by allowing more realistic message processing scenarios.
64-73: Ensure correct response type in test scenarios.The addition of response type handling and merging ensures the response is correctly constructed. This change improves the clarity and functionality of the test setup.
x/auth/ante/setup.go (2)
49-50: Improve error handling by validating response type.The change to type-assert the response and handle unexpected types improves the robustness of the function by catching errors early.
54-57: Add error handling for unexpected response types.By adding error handling for unexpected response types, this change enhances the function's robustness and prevents potential runtime errors.
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/utils_test.go (2)
Line range hint
76-91: Simplify callback signatures for clarity.The simplification of the callback signatures by removing unused parameters improves the clarity of the function.
91-113: Enhance response handling in test scenarios.The changes to return a
ProtoMsgand handle response merging improve the clarity and functionality of the test setup, allowing for more realistic scenarios.x/accounts/account_test.go (3)
31-31: Ensure correct response handling inRegisterInitHandler.The removal of type parameters from
QueryModulesimplifies the call. Ensure that the response is handled correctly and matches expected types.Verification successful
No response handling needed for
QueryModuleinRegisterInitHandler.In the test file
account_test.go, theQueryModulecall withinRegisterInitHandleris used for validation purposes, and its response is not processed further. Ensure this pattern is consistent across other usages if applicable. No issues found with the current implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the response handling in `RegisterInitHandler` matches expected types. # Test: Search for `RegisterInitHandler` usage and verify response handling. rg --type go -A 5 'RegisterInitHandler'Length of output: 10032
55-55: Ensure correct response handling inRegisterExecuteHandlers.The removal of type parameters from
ExecModulesimplifies the call. Ensure that the response is handled correctly and matches expected types.Verification successful
Response handling in
RegisterExecuteHandlersis correct.The response handling in the
RegisterExecuteHandlersfunction matches the expected types and is consistent across different implementations. The removal of type parameters fromExecModuledoes not affect this correctness.
- Files and lines where
RegisterExecuteHandlersis implemented:
x/accounts/account_test.gox/accounts/internal/implementation/account_test.gox/accounts/testing/counter/counter.gox/accounts/testing/account_abstraction/minimal.gox/accounts/defaults/lockup/delayed_locking_account.gox/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.gox/accounts/defaults/lockup/permanent_locking_account.gox/accounts/defaults/multisig/account.gox/accounts/defaults/lockup/periodic_locking_account.gox/accounts/defaults/lockup/continuous_locking_account.gox/accounts/defaults/base/account.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the response handling in `RegisterExecuteHandlers` matches expected types. # Test: Search for `RegisterExecuteHandlers` usage and verify response handling. rg --type go -A 5 'RegisterExecuteHandlers'Length of output: 9119
93-104: Verify type assertion and response handling inRegisterQueryHandlers.The addition of a type assertion for the response enhances error handling. Ensure that the response type is as expected to avoid unnecessary panics.
Verification successful
Type assertion in
RegisterQueryHandlersis valid and necessary.The type assertion for
QueryBalanceResponseensures that the response fromQueryModuleis correctly handled, preventing unexpected types from causing issues. This is a valid enhancement to error handling.
- The
QueryModulefunction returns a genericProtoMsg, making the type assertion necessary.- The
QueryBalanceResponsestruct is a standard type used across different modules.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the response type in `RegisterQueryHandlers` is as expected. # Test: Search for `RegisterQueryHandlers` usage and verify response type handling. rg --type go -A 5 'RegisterQueryHandlers'Length of output: 5574
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the implementation of the `QueryModule` function and verify response handling. # Search for the `QueryModule` function definition to understand its return type. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func QueryModule($_, $_) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for the `QueryBalanceResponse` struct to verify its definition and usage. rg --type go 'type QueryBalanceResponse struct'Length of output: 1463
runtime/router.go (2)
Line range hint
109-138:
Confirm error handling inqueryRouterService.Invoke.The consolidation of query handling into a single
Invokefunction simplifies the interface. Ensure that error handling is robust, particularly in the creation and management of response objects.Verification successful
Error handling in
queryRouterService.Invokeis adequately verified.The test cases in
runtime/router_test.goconfirm that error handling is robust. They check for specific error messages when the response type is not found and ensure correct behavior for valid requests. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in `queryRouterService.Invoke`. # Test: Search for `queryRouterService.Invoke` usage and verify error handling. rg --type go -A 5 'queryRouterService.Invoke'Length of output: 922
Line range hint
48-75:
Confirm error handling inmsgRouterService.Invoke.The consolidation of message handling into a single
Invokefunction simplifies the interface. Ensure that error handling is robust, particularly in the creation and management of response objects.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (2)
84-92: Verify response handling inExecModule.The simplification of the
ExecModulefunction reduces complexity. Ensure that response handling is correct and aligns with the expected module execution outcomes.Verification successful
Response handling in
ExecModuleis adequately verified.The
ExecModulefunction is tested in multiple contexts, ensuring that it handles responses correctly. These tests confirm that the function executes as expected and returns the correct responses, aligning with the intended functionality. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify response handling in `ExecModule`. # Test: Search for `ExecModule` usage and verify response handling. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecModule'Length of output: 5162
98-104: Verify response handling inQueryModule.The simplification of the
QueryModulefunction reduces complexity. Ensure that response handling is correct and aligns with the expected module query outcomes.Verification successful
Response handling in
QueryModuleis adequately verified.The existing tests in the codebase ensure that
QueryModulehandles responses correctly, including error handling and expected outcomes. These tests confirm that the function's behavior aligns with expected module query results.
- Tests in
x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.goand other related files validate response handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify response handling in `QueryModule`. # Test: Search for `QueryModule` usage and verify response handling. rg --type go -A 5 'QueryModule'Length of output: 207205
x/upgrade/keeper/abci.go (1)
48-56: LGTM! Verify the usage ofInvoke.The changes improve error handling and type safety by using a type assertion after invoking the
Invokemethod. Ensure that all usages ofInvokein the codebase handle responses correctly.server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
161-168: LGTM! Verify the removal ofInvokeTyped.The refactoring simplifies the message invocation logic by consolidating it into a single
Invokemethod. Ensure that all references toInvokeTypedhave been removed from the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
InvokeTypedhas been removed from the codebase.The search for any occurrences of
InvokeTypedreturned no results, confirming its complete removal.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `InvokeTyped` method from the codebase. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `InvokeTyped`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go $'InvokeTyped'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `InvokeTyped` method definition from the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of `InvokeTyped`. Expect: No occurrences. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func InvokeTyped($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete removal of `InvokeTyped` from the codebase. # Test: Search for any occurrences of `InvokeTyped` in all files. Expect: No occurrences. rg 'InvokeTyped'Length of output: 16
x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (1)
93-99: LGTM! Verify the removal ofExecModuleUntyped.The simplification of
ExecModuleandQueryModulefunctions enhances clarity and maintainability. Ensure that all references toExecModuleUntypedhave been removed from the codebase.Verification successful
Removal of
ExecModuleUntypedVerifiedThe reference to
ExecModuleUntypedfound inx/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.gois within a comment and not in active code. This confirms thatExecModuleUntypedhas been removed from the codebase. The comment does not affect the functionality.
x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go: Reference found in a comment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `ExecModuleUntyped` function from the codebase. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `ExecModuleUntyped`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go $'ExecModuleUntyped'Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the context around the reference to `ExecModuleUntyped` in the test file rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'ExecModuleUntyped' x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.goLength of output: 800
x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (1)
166-178: Ensure sufficient test coverage for new return types.The change to return
ProtoMsgalongsideerrorenhances flexibility. Ensure that tests cover scenarios where the returned message is used, and validate the correctness of the returned message.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (3)
20-21: Verify the necessity of added dependencies.Ensure that the newly added dependencies
cosmossdk.io/core/testingandcosmossdk.io/depinjectare required for the module's functionality and do not introduce unnecessary bloat.Verification successful
Dependencies are necessary and widely used.
The dependencies
cosmossdk.io/core/testingandcosmossdk.io/depinjectare extensively used across the codebase, particularly in test files and some non-test files, confirming their necessity for the module's functionality.
cosmossdk.io/core/testingis used in numerous test files, indicating its role in testing.cosmossdk.io/depinjectis used in both test and non-test files, suggesting its importance for dependency injection.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of newly added dependencies in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `cosmossdk.io/core/testing`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/core/testing' # Test: Search for usage of `cosmossdk.io/depinject`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/depinject'Length of output: 13586
44-44: Check for potential conflicts withgithub.com/cometbft/cometbft/api.The version
v1.0.0-rc.1might be a release candidate. Ensure compatibility and stability within the project.
48-48: Ensure compatibility withgithub.com/cosmos/crypto.Verify that the new dependency
github.com/cosmos/crypto v0.1.2does not conflict with existing cryptographic operations.x/accounts/go.mod (5)
83-83: Confirm the reintroduction ofgithub.com/golang/mock.Ensure that
github.com/golang/mock v1.6.0is necessary for testing purposes and does not introduce redundant dependencies.Verification successful
Reintroduction of
github.com/golang/mockis necessary and justified.The
github.com/golang/mockpackage is used extensively across various test files in the codebase, indicating its necessity for testing purposes. There is no evidence of redundant dependencies introduced by this package.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `github.com/golang/mock` in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `github.com/golang/mock`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'github.com/golang/mock'Length of output: 6894
29-29: Verify the necessity ofcosmossdk.io/schema.Ensure that the dependency
cosmossdk.io/schema v0.1.1is required for the module's functionality and does not introduce unnecessary bloat.Verification successful
cosmossdk.io/schemais a necessary dependency.The
cosmossdk.io/schemapackage is used extensively across multiple files in the codebase, indicating its importance for the module's functionality. Removing it could disrupt the module's operations.
- Usage found in various directories such as
schema/testing,schema/decoding,schema/indexer,indexer/postgres, andbaseapp.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `cosmossdk.io/schema` in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `cosmossdk.io/schema`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/schema'Length of output: 3134
34-34: Check for potential impact ofcosmossdk.io/x/distribution.The addition of
cosmossdk.io/x/distributioncould impact module interactions. Verify its necessity and ensure it aligns with the module's objectives.Verification successful
cosmossdk.io/x/distributionis integral to the module's functionality.The
cosmossdk.io/x/distributionmodule is extensively used across various components, including tests, simulations, and core functionalities. Its presence is necessary for the module's operations and aligns with the module's objectives. Therefore, its inclusion is justified and should be retained.
- Files with usage:
x/distribution/keeper/keeper.gox/distribution/module.gosimapp/app.go- Various test and simulation files
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and necessity of `cosmossdk.io/x/distribution`. # Test: Search for usage of `cosmossdk.io/x/distribution`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/x/distribution'Length of output: 8886
184-184: Update the replace directive forcosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockup.The change in the path for the replace directive could impact local module resolution. Ensure that this change is intentional and aligns with the project's structure.
Verification successful
Replace directive for
cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockupis correctly updated.The replace directive pointing to
./defaults/lockupaligns with the project's structure and ensures local module resolution. There are no indications of issues from the search results.
- The directive ensures that the local version of the module is used across the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the replace directive change for `cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockup`. # Test: Check for any issues related to module resolution. go mod tidy && go mod verifyLength of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockup` in the codebase. rg 'cosmossdk\.io/x/accounts/defaults/lockup' -A 5Length of output: 15276
122-122: Assess the impact ofgithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg.The addition of
github.com/munnerz/goautonegshould be evaluated for its necessity and potential impact on the module.Verification successful
github.com/munnerz/goautonegis an indirect dependencyThe package
github.com/munnerz/goautonegis listed as an indirect dependency ingo.mod, indicating it is required by another dependency in the project. Its presence ingo.sumwith checksums confirms its role in the dependency tree. No direct usage was found in the codebase, so its inclusion seems necessary for the proper functioning of other dependencies.
- File:
x/accounts/go.mod- File:
x/accounts/go.sumScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and necessity of `github.com/munnerz/goautoneg`. # Test: Search for usage of `github.com/munnerz/goautoneg`. Expect: At least one usage. rg --type go 'github.com/munnerz/goautoneg'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for comments or notes in go.mod related to `github.com/munnerz/goautoneg` rg 'github.com/munnerz/goautoneg' x/accounts/go.mod -A 2 # Check if `github.com/munnerz/goautoneg` is listed in go.sum as an indirect dependency rg 'github.com/munnerz/goautoneg' x/accounts/go.sumLength of output: 545
x/group/go.mod (1)
49-49: Ensure the necessity of the new indirect dependency.The addition of
cosmossdk.io/x/distributionas an indirect dependency should be verified for necessity. Ensure it is required for the build or tests.Verification successful
The indirect dependency
cosmossdk.io/x/distributionis necessary.The package
cosmossdk.io/x/distributionis used extensively across various files in the codebase, indicating its importance for both functionality and testing. Therefore, its inclusion as an indirect dependency is justified.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if `cosmossdk.io/x/distribution` is used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the package. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type go 'cosmossdk.io/x/distribution'Length of output: 8886
x/gov/keeper/abci.go (1)
291-291: Confirm the correctness of the method change toInvoke.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokesuggests a shift towards stronger typing. Verify that theInvokemethod is correctly implemented and compatible with the expected behavior.x/auth/keeper/keeper.go (1)
318-318: Verify the method change toSendModuleMessage.The change from
SendModuleMessageUntypedtoSendModuleMessageindicates a refinement in the method's interface. Ensure that the new method is correctly implemented and maintains the intended functionality.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account_test.go (3)
18-18: Parameter renaming improves clarity.Renaming the parameter to
_indicates that it is intentionally unused, which enhances code readability.
445-451: Simplified mock context creation.The changes streamline the mock context setup, focusing on the necessary parameters for the test.
Ensure that the test logic aligns with the new context setup.
Verification successful
Test logic aligns with the simplified mock context setup.
The
TestProposal_NotPassingfunction appropriately uses the simplified mock context setup, ensuring the test logic remains consistent and focused on necessary parameters.
- The mock context creation and its usage in the test are aligned with the intended simplification.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test logic in `TestProposal_NotPassing` aligns with the new mock context setup. # Test: Search for `TestProposal_NotPassing` to review its logic. Expect: Consistency with the new mock context setup. rg --type go -A 5 'func TestProposal_NotPassing'Length of output: 512
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Capture more lines of the `TestProposal_NotPassing` function to ensure complete logic is reviewed. # Test: Retrieve additional lines of the `TestProposal_NotPassing` function. rg --type go -A 50 'func TestProposal_NotPassing'Length of output: 3433
Line range hint
566-579: Consistent mock context setup.The changes ensure consistency in the mock context setup across tests.
Verify that the test logic aligns with the new context setup.
Verification successful
Test logic aligns with the new mock context setup.
The
TestProposalPassingfunction correctly uses the updatedNewMockContextsetup and maintains consistency throughout its logic. The setup, execution, and assertions are aligned with the intended test behavior.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test logic in `TestProposalPassing` aligns with the new mock context setup. # Test: Search for `TestProposalPassing` to review its logic. Expect: Consistency with the new mock context setup. rg --type go -A 5 'func TestProposalPassing'Length of output: 504
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the complete implementation of `TestProposalPassing` to verify its logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestProposalPassing($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 10539
testutil/mock/types_module_module.go (1)
268-328: New mock struct and methods added for testing.The
MockhasServicesV1struct and its methods provide necessary functionality to mock thehasServicesV1interface, enhancing testing capabilities.x/authz/keeper/keeper.go (1)
148-148: Refactored to useInvokefor message dispatching.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokealigns with the refactoring objectives to simplify message invocation.Ensure that the
Invokemethod is correctly implemented and used across the codebase.Verification successful
Refactored
Invokeusage is consistent across the codebaseThe
Invokemethod is widely used across various modules and appears to be implemented consistently with the expected behavior. The change fromInvokeUntypedtoInvokein theauthz/keeper/keeper.gofile aligns with the overall usage pattern observed in the codebase.
- The
Invokemethod is implemented incore/router/service.go, which confirms its presence and expected functionality.- Multiple instances of
Invokeusage across different files indicate its integration into the system.This refactoring aligns with the intended simplification of message invocation.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Invoke` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `Invoke` method to review its implementation and usage. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go -A 5 'Invoke('Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Invoke` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `Invoke` method to review its implementation and usage. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go -A 5 'Invoke\('Length of output: 206420
x/accounts/keeper.go (3)
387-400: Simplified function logic approved.The removal of the
msgRespparameter insendModuleMessagesimplifies the function and aligns with the refactoring goals.
406-407: Improved clarity inqueryModulefunction.The changes to
queryModuleenhance clarity by directly returning the response.
Line range hint
362-379:
LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to
SendModuleMessagelook good, but ensure all calls to this function are updated to match the new signature.Verification successful
Function
SendModuleMessageusage is consistent with the new signature.The function
SendModuleMessagehas been updated to handle typed messages and returns a response of typeimplementation.ProtoMsg. The updated signature is correctly used across the codebase, including in the following files:
x/auth/keeper/keeper.gox/accounts/keeper.go- Mocks in
x/auth/vesting/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.goandx/auth/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SendModuleMessage` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'SendModuleMessage'Length of output: 5003
x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
389-389: Enhanced type safety inSudoExec.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokeinSudoExecimproves type safety and aligns with the refactoring goals.server/v2/stf/stf.go (3)
324-324: Improved type safety inrunTxMsgs.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokeinrunTxMsgsenhances type safety, aligning with refactoring objectives.
360-360: Type safety improvement inrunConsensusMessages.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokeinrunConsensusMessagesenhances type safety, aligning with refactoring objectives.
473-473: Enhanced type safety inQuery.The change from
InvokeUntypedtoInvokeinQueryimproves type safety, aligning with refactoring objectives.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (1)
405-414: LGTM! Verify response type handling in similar functions.The type assertion ensures the response is of the expected type, enhancing robustness.
types/module/module.go (1)
99-100: LGTM! Verify usage ofappmodulev2.AppModule.The change to use
appmodulev2.AppModulelikely reflects an upgrade or refactor. Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Consistent Usage of
appmodulev2.AppModuleFoundThe usage of
appmodulev2.AppModuleis consistent across various parts of the codebase, includingtypes/module/module.go,x/auth/module.go, and multiple files in theruntime/v2directory. This suggests that the refactor or upgrade has been applied uniformly. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `appmodulev2.AppModule`. # Test: Search for `appmodulev2.AppModule` usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'appmodulev2.AppModule'Length of output: 903
x/accounts/defaults/base/account.go
Outdated
| accNum, err := accountstd.QueryModule(ctx, &accountsv1.AccountNumberRequest{Address: addrStr}) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return 0, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return accNum.Number, nil | ||
| resp, ok := accNum.(*accountsv1.AccountNumberResponse) | ||
| if !ok { | ||
| return 0, errors.New("unexpected response type") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling for type assertion.
The type assertion for accNum should use the comma-ok idiom to handle unexpected types gracefully. Consider providing more context in the error message.
resp, ok := accNum.(*accountsv1.AccountNumberResponse)
if !ok {
return 0, fmt.Errorf("unexpected response type: %T", accNum)
}
| @@ -46,11 +46,16 @@ func (sud SetUpContextDecorator) AnteHandle(ctx sdk.Context, tx sdk.Tx, _ bool, | |||
| newCtx = SetGasMeter(ctx, gasTx.GetGas()) | |||
|
|
|||
| // TODO: possibly cache the result of this query for other antehandlers to use | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should create an issue for this todo. i have a few ideas how we can do this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/accounts/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/group/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (3)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
- x/accounts/go.mod
- x/group/go.mod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/accounts/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/group/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (5)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/authz/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
- x/accounts/go.mod
- x/authz/keeper/keeper.go
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go
- x/group/go.mod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/accounts/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/group/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (8)
- server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go (3 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2 hunks)
- types/module/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go
- server/v2/stf/stf.go
- types/module/module.go
- x/accounts/go.mod
- x/group/go.mod
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (3)
server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (1)
43-47: LGTM! The test updates align with the refactoring.The changes to use
router.Invokeinstead ofrouter.InvokeUntypedare appropriate given the refactoring. The test case name update is consistent with the new method name.server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
162-169: LGTM! TheInvokemethod refactoring enhances clarity.The consolidation of invocation methods into
Invokesimplifies the interface and improves clarity. The error handling for unknown message types is appropriate.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1)
Line range hint
16-130: Verify the impact of dependency changes.The addition and removal of dependencies suggest a reorganization of the module's reliance on certain libraries. Ensure that these changes do not negatively impact the module's functionality or compatibility.
Run the following script to verify the impact of dependency changes:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/accounts/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/group/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (8)
- server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go (3 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2 hunks)
- types/module/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/go.mod (4 hunks)
- x/group/go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go
- server/v2/stf/stf.go
- types/module/module.go
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
- x/accounts/go.mod
- x/group/go.mod
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (2)
server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go (1)
43-47: LGTM! The test case updates are consistent with the refactoring.The renaming of the test case and the use of
router.Invokealign with the changes to streamline invocation methods.server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
162-169: LGTM! TheInvokemethod refactoring simplifies the invocation process.The method now directly uses the handler associated with the message type, aligning with the refactoring goals.
github-actions
bot
added
C:CLI
C:Cosmovisor
|
As x/accounts was already depending on the bank module and the SDK, I reverted the proto v2 wrapper hack that we were doing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (2)
5-6: Ensure imports are necessary and organized.The import of
banktypesis used in the function, but ensure all imports are necessary and organized according to the Uber Golang style guide.
14-14: Update the function signature comment.The comment above the
coinsTransferMsgFunctype definition should be updated to reflect the new function signature that returns a singletransaction.Msgand anerror.// coinsTransferMsgFunc defines a function that creates a message to send coins from one -// address to the other, and also a message that parses such response. +// address to the other.x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (2)
8-8: Ensure imports are necessary and organized.The import of
transactionis used throughout the file, but ensure all imports are necessary and organized according to the Uber Golang style guide.
17-17: Clarify theProtoMsgGinterface comment.The comment for the
ProtoMsgGinterface should be updated to reflect the change totransaction.Msg.// ProtoMsgG is a generic interface for protobuf messages. +// It now uses transaction.Msg for message handling.x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (1)
7-7: Ensure imports are necessary and organized.The import of
transactionis used throughout the file, but ensure all imports are necessary and organized according to the Uber Golang style guide.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (22)
- schema/appdata/batch_test.go (1 hunks)
- schema/diff/diff_test.go (1 hunks)
- tools/cosmovisor/cmd/cosmovisor/version_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/account_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/base/account.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/base/utils_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/utils_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.go (7 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (5 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/keeper.go (14 hunks)
- x/auth/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/authz/client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- schema/appdata/batch_test.go
- schema/diff/diff_test.go
- tools/cosmovisor/cmd/cosmovisor/version_test.go
- x/authz/client/cli/tx.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- x/accounts/account_test.go
- x/accounts/defaults/base/account.go
- x/accounts/defaults/base/utils_test.go
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/lockup.go
- x/accounts/defaults/lockup/utils_test.go
- x/accounts/defaults/multisig/account_test.go
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (10)
x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/auth/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/accounts/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (50)
x/accounts/coin_transfer.go (1)
17-30: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
defaultCoinsTransferMsgFuncfunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new return type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified
The usage of
defaultCoinsTransferMsgFuncin the codebase has been verified, and it correctly handles the new return type. No further updates are necessary.
x/accounts/keeper.go: The function is used in a context that aligns with the new signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `defaultCoinsTransferMsgFunc` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'defaultCoinsTransferMsgFunc'Length of output: 1229
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of the `makeSendCoinsMsg` function to verify how it handles the return value of `defaultCoinsTransferMsgFunc`. rg --type go -A 10 'makeSendCoinsMsg'Length of output: 2096
x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (6)
60-60: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
Mergefunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
64-64: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
Equalfunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
45-45: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
UnpackAnyTofunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified: All usages of the
UnpackAnyTofunction match the new signature in the codebase. No further updates are needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `UnpackAnyTo` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'UnpackAnyTo'Length of output: 1075
30-30: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
MessageNamefunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Function Usage Updated
The
MessageNamefunction with the new parameter typetransaction.Msgis correctly used in the codebase. The relevant usages are consistent with the updated function signature.
- Relevant Usages:
x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.gox/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.gox/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `MessageName` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'MessageName'Length of output: 46589
35-35: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
PackAnyfunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
22-27: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
FindMessageByNamefunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new return type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
No usage of
FindMessageByNamefound in the codebase.The function
FindMessageByNamefromx/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.gois not directly called anywhere in the codebase. There are no concerns about updating its usage to handle the new return type.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `FindMessageByName` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'FindMessageByName'Length of output: 3902
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to the specific `FindMessageByName` function from `encoding.go` to verify usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'FindMessageByName($_)' --jsonLength of output: 64
x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (3)
18-18: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
RegisterInitHandlerfunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter types.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
All occurrences of the
RegisterInitHandlerfunction in the codebase match the new signature with two parameters. No further updates are needed.
- Verified in files such as
account_test.go,minimal.go,counter.go, and others.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RegisterInitHandler` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'RegisterInitHandler'Length of output: 10030
44-44: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
RegisterExecuteHandlerfunction are approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new parameter types.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified Successfully
All instances of the
RegisterExecuteHandlerfunction have been updated to match the new signature with the parameter types involving generic types. The verification is complete, and no further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RegisterExecuteHandler` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'RegisterExecuteHandler'Length of output: 15273
73-73: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The changes to the
Newfunction inMessageSchemaare approved. Ensure that all usages of this function are updated to handle the new return type.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
No direct usage of
MessageSchema.Newfound in the codebase.The
Newfunction inMessageSchemais defined but not directly invoked elsewhere in the codebase, as per the search results. This suggests that no updates are necessary for its usage. If the function is intended to be used, please ensure it is integrated correctly where needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `New` in `MessageSchema` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewProtoMessageSchema'Length of output: 1778
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `New` in `MessageSchema` to ensure they match the new signature. # Search for the `New` function within `MessageSchema`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type MessageSchema struct { $$$ New func() $_ $$$ }' # Search for all usages of `MessageSchema.New` in the codebase. rg --type go 'MessageSchema.New'Length of output: 692
x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.go (5)
27-27: LGTM! Enhanced type specificity.The change to use
transaction.Msgimproves type safety and clarity.
Line range hint
35-39: LGTM! Consistent handler signature update.The
makeHandlerfunction now returns a handler usingtransaction.Msg, aligning with the updated handler function signature.
Line range hint
45-54: LGTM! Consistent map signature update.The handlers map now uses
transaction.Msg, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Line range hint
64-79: LGTM! Consistent handler signature update.The
makeHandlerfunction now returns a handler usingtransaction.Msg, aligning with the updated handlers map.
101-103: LGTM! Consistent handler signature update.The
makeHandlerfunction now returns a handler usingtransaction.Msg, ensuring consistency with theExecuteBuilder.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (5)
18-19: LGTM! Enhanced type specificity.The change to use
transaction.MsginModuleExecFuncandModuleQueryFuncimproves type safety and clarity.
25-31: LGTM! Simplified context value structure.The removal of
moduleExecUntypedand the focus ontransaction.Msgsimplifies the struct and aligns with the refactoring goals.
60-66: LGTM! Consistent context creation.The
MakeAccountContextfunction now usesModuleExecFuncandModuleQueryFuncwithtransaction.Msg, ensuring consistency with the updated context value structure.
85-92: LGTM! Simplified execution logic.The
ExecModulefunction now usestransaction.Msg, simplifying the execution logic and aligning with the refactoring goals.
99-105: LGTM! Simplified query logic.The
QueryModulefunction now usestransaction.Msg, simplifying the query logic and aligning with the refactoring goals.x/auth/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
188-189: LGTM! Aligned with updated interface.The method call update to
SendModuleMessagealigns with the updated interface definitions and enhances type safety.x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (3)
94-95: Simplified function signature enhances readability.The removal of generic type parameters in
ExecModulesimplifies the function signature, making it more readable and maintainable.
99-100: Consistent simplification of function signature.The
QueryModulefunction benefits from the same simplification asExecModule, improving consistency and readability.
109-110: Enhanced type safety withtransaction.Msg.The use of
transaction.MsginPackAnyaligns with the refactoring strategy, enhancing type safety.x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.go (7)
111-112: Improved type safety inInitfunction.The
Initfunction now usestransaction.Msg, aligning with the refactoring strategy and enhancing type safety.
113-114: Consistent use oftransaction.MsginExecutefunction.The
Executefunction now usestransaction.Msg, enhancing type safety and consistency with the refactoring strategy.
115-116: Enhanced type safety inQueryfunction.The
Queryfunction now usestransaction.Msg, aligning with the refactoring strategy and enhancing type safety.
127-129: Improved type safety inHasExecmethod.The
HasExecmethod now usestransaction.Msg, aligning with the refactoring strategy and enhancing type safety.
133-135: Consistent use oftransaction.MsginHasQuerymethod.The
HasQuerymethod now usestransaction.Msg, enhancing type safety and consistency with the refactoring strategy.
139-140: Improved type safety inHasInitmethod.The
HasInitmethod now usestransaction.Msg, aligning with the refactoring strategy and enhancing type safety.
149-150: Consistent use oftransaction.MsginNewfunction.The
Newfunction now returnstransaction.Msg, enhancing type safety and consistency with the refactoring strategy.x/accounts/defaults/multisig/utils_test.go (1)
167-179: Enhanced flexibility innewMockContextfunction.The updated callback signatures in
newMockContextenhance flexibility by returning atransaction.Msgalongside any potential error, aligning with the new pattern.x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (11)
16-16: Verify the necessity ofgithub.com/golang/groupcache.Ensure that this dependency is required and does not introduce any unwanted side effects or conflicts.
22-22: Addition ofcosmossdk.io/core/testingis appropriate.This dependency supports enhanced testing capabilities.
23-23: Addition ofcosmossdk.io/depinjectis beneficial.This dependency supports improved modularity and testability through dependency injection.
29-29: Verify the impact of removingcosmossdk.io/x/consensus.Ensure that this removal does not affect any critical functionality or introduce breaking changes.
46-46: Verify the necessity and compatibility ofgithub.com/cometbft/cometbft/api.Ensure that this dependency is required and compatible with the existing codebase.
50-50: Addition ofgithub.com/cosmos/cryptois appropriate.This dependency supports enhanced cryptographic functionalities.
58-58: Verify the necessity and compatibility ofgithub.com/dgraph-io/badger/v4.Ensure that this dependency is required and compatible with the existing codebase.
74-74: Addition ofgithub.com/google/flatbuffersis beneficial.This dependency supports efficient serialization.
97-97: Verify the necessity and compatibility ofgithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg.Ensure that this dependency is required and compatible with the existing codebase.
121-121: Addition ofgithub.com/supranational/blstis appropriate.This dependency supports enhanced cryptographic functionalities, specifically BLS signatures.
130-130: Addition ofgo.opencensus.iois beneficial.This dependency supports improved observability and metrics.
x/accounts/keeper.go (7)
141-143: FunctionInitupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
162-162: FunctioninitFromMsgupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
186-188: Functioninitupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
227-228: FunctionMigrateLegacyAccountupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
237-239: FunctionExecuteupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
269-270: FunctionQueryupdated to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the new transaction message structure.
363-365: FunctionSendModuleMessagerefactored to usetransaction.Msg.The changes align with the refactoring goals and maintain functionality.
julienrbrt
added
the
backport/v0.52.x
(cherry picked from commit a554a21) # Conflicts: # core/router/service.go # schema/appdata/batch_test.go # schema/diff/diff_test.go # server/v2/stf/core_router_service.go # server/v2/stf/stf.go # server/v2/stf/stf_router.go # server/v2/stf/stf_router_test.go # tools/cosmovisor/cmd/cosmovisor/version_test.go # x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod # x/accounts/go.mod # x/accounts/go.sum # x/group/go.sum
… (#21392) Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>
Description
Ref: #21176
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores