Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(test) Add tests for callback execution when forwarding a packet (backport #6805) #6884

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 21, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Description

ref: #6578


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #6805 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* Add test for callbacks in forwarding scenario

* Add comments

* Lint

* Added test case.

(cherry picked from commit 98183d9)
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 21, 2024

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 8611530 into release/v9.0.x Jul 21, 2024
62 of 65 checks passed
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the mergify/bp/release/v9.0.x/pr-6805 branch July 21, 2024 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants