-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CH.1.1.12 sublineage with Orf1a:Q3966R competing with XBB.1*486P variants in Denmark ( 147 Sequences) #1816
Comments
121 seqs s today. For the first tima a sample came from Luxembourg too |
This sublineage has also been noted to have a mutation that appears on some tools such as CoV-Spectrum as ORF1a:M85V (see https://twitter.com/mrmickme/status/1640905141992964097). Looking at it, “ORF1a:M85V” is actually a 9-nucleotide deletion at 510-518 starting at the second nucleotide of the ORF1a:G82 and extending to the first nucleotide of ORF1a:M85. Tools call cases like this weird so some but not all will show ORF1a:M85V. For instance CoV-Spectrum shows ORF1a:M85V, but I don’t see it on the UShER phylogenetic tree. That is very likely due to differences in how the tools handle the deletion. But functionally this deletion changes ORF1a:82-85 from GHVM to simply V without a nucleotide change. As far as I can tell, this 510-518 deletion happened somewhere along the evolutionary path from CH.1.1 to CH.1.1.12. I also note that recently-designated CH.1.1.21 has a different but similar 509-523 deletion that spans all of ORF1a:82-86 but is codon aligned. Functionally, this deletion is in non-structural protein 1 (NSP1) of the ORF1a/ORF1ab polyprotein. NSP1 disrupts translation of host mRNA to proteins by locking host mRNA out of the ribosomes which impacts antiviral defenses such as interferon production, response to interferon stimulation, and likely just about every other cellular process. (Low et al https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/9/1991). If these deletions are in loop 3-4 of NSP1, they may particularly impact host translational processes. (https://compsysbio.ornl.gov/nonstructural-protein-1-nsp1/) |
Thanks @alurqu ! Orf1a:85 del was tracked for long time by @bitbyte2015 and discussed together with @thomasppeacock @corneliusroemer several times. It was a del popping up several times contemporary in different sublineages reaching a max of 5% in BA.2 era i think (i m going by memory so maybe wrong) |
France and England and it reached 133. |
Looking at the tree:https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_b3fc_16f6c0.json?c=country&label=id:node_8154487 It seems that this branch has gained further mutations, especially the branch with S:M1229I seems to be faster than the rest: https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/Denmark/AllSamples/Past3M/variants?aaMutations=ORF1a%3AQ3966R&nextcladePangoLineage=CH.1.1.12*&aaMutations1=S%3AM1229I&nextcladePangoLineage1=CH.1.1.12*&analysisMode=CompareToBaseline& But also the other branches are showing very interesting evolution like in this case with 3 additional Spike mutations (186,556,614S) and one N mutation at defining BA.4 residue 151. |
147 sequences as today. Still just in Denmark |
160 sequences as today . newly found in Italy, France and Israel. |
…esignations, and 24 updated from CH.1.1.12
Added new lineage FS.1 from #1816 with 111 new sequence designations, and 24 updated from CH.1.1.12
…th 111 new sequence designations, and 24 updated from CH.1.1.12
Added missing lineages.csv updates for FS.1 from #1816 with 111 new sequence designations, and 24 updated from CH.1.1.12
Thanks for submitting. We've added lineage FS.1 with 111 newly designated sequences, and 24 updated. Defining mutation A12162G (ORF1a:Q3966R) (following C24134A (S:L858I), nt:C6016T). |
This was discovered due a great spot by Benedict Barclay on twitter (HERE to read)
He noticed that CH.1.1.12 in Denmark was not declining and instead has reached a share above 10%.
At a first check @josetteshoenma @alurqu and me spot have spotted one sublineage rising fast in Denmark as share of CH.1.1.12.
And curiously once again it was not defined by a spike mutation but by a NSP8 mutation, ( A12162G interestingly very close to BA.5 defining synonymous mutation G12160A cc @alurqu please share your analysis here!) that corresponds to orf1a:Q3966R
Orf1a:Q3966R is not a new mutation in this pandemic : it emerged very early in Alpha reaching 69K sequences and a maximum global share of 6% at the start of April 2021:
here the global Alpha Tree with this mutation:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_34069_349dd0.json?f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample&label=id:node_8913109
Globally its apaprent advantage over plain alpha was around 5% in 2021
Beyond Alpha it recurrently popped up in various vocs:
Weirdly it was never proposed nor mentioned in the whole Pango Designation Rep.
Coming back to our days:
Defining Mutations:
CH.1.1.12 >> Orf1a:Q3966R (A12162G =NSP8_Q24R)
Tree:
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_350a7_2dd100.json?c=gt-ORF1ab_3966&label=id:node_8092323
Gisaid query: C6016T,A12162G,C24134A
Sequences:
EPI_ISL_16408537, EPI_ISL_16503204, EPI_ISL_16503290,
EPI_ISL_16503307, EPI_ISL_16503598, EPI_ISL_16515292,
EPI_ISL_16547768, EPI_ISL_16547821, EPI_ISL_16547970,
EPI_ISL_16548138, EPI_ISL_16646874, EPI_ISL_16647097,
EPI_ISL_16697621, EPI_ISL_16697645, EPI_ISL_16697649,
EPI_ISL_16749696, EPI_ISL_16749818, EPI_ISL_16856559,
EPI_ISL_16856698, EPI_ISL_16856797, EPI_ISL_16857091,
EPI_ISL_16866486, EPI_ISL_16912548, EPI_ISL_16912556,
EPI_ISL_16938752, EPI_ISL_16938778, EPI_ISL_16938792,
EPI_ISL_16938829, EPI_ISL_16938998, EPI_ISL_16985225,
EPI_ISL_16985240, EPI_ISL_16985407, EPI_ISL_17007580,
EPI_ISL_17007651-17007652, EPI_ISL_17007661, EPI_ISL_17007715,
EPI_ISL_17048498, EPI_ISL_17048508, EPI_ISL_17048581,
EPI_ISL_17048702, EPI_ISL_17048721, EPI_ISL_17048838,
EPI_ISL_17048927, EPI_ISL_17155362, EPI_ISL_17155424,
EPI_ISL_17155490, EPI_ISL_17155507, EPI_ISL_17155509,
EPI_ISL_17155565, EPI_ISL_17155570, EPI_ISL_17155630,
EPI_ISL_17155641, EPI_ISL_17155647, EPI_ISL_17210298,
EPI_ISL_17210358, EPI_ISL_17210362, EPI_ISL_17210365,
EPI_ISL_17210384, EPI_ISL_17210431, EPI_ISL_17210502,
EPI_ISL_17218585, EPI_ISL_17221869, EPI_ISL_17242664,
EPI_ISL_17257673, EPI_ISL_17257693, EPI_ISL_17257745,
EPI_ISL_17257764, EPI_ISL_17257775, EPI_ISL_17257799,
EPI_ISL_17257802, EPI_ISL_17257875, EPI_ISL_17257913,
EPI_ISL_17268865, EPI_ISL_17268979, EPI_ISL_17269001,
EPI_ISL_17269037, EPI_ISL_17269074, EPI_ISL_17269080,
EPI_ISL_17269097, EPI_ISL_17269140, EPI_ISL_17269223,
EPI_ISL_17269234, EPI_ISL_17269269, EPI_ISL_17269272,
EPI_ISL_17269281, EPI_ISL_17269302, EPI_ISL_17269320,
EPI_ISL_17269352, EPI_ISL_17269380, EPI_ISL_17269388,
EPI_ISL_17269408, EPI_ISL_17269417, EPI_ISL_17315148,
EPI_ISL_17315243, EPI_ISL_17315299, EPI_ISL_17315381,
EPI_ISL_17315428, EPI_ISL_17315472, EPI_ISL_17315496,
EPI_ISL_17315512, EPI_ISL_17315550, EPI_ISL_17315602,
EPI_ISL_17315694, EPI_ISL_17315761
Growth Advantage:
Looking at the last two months this sublineage has a comparable growth versus all XBB.1 sublineagees carrying S:F486P
And its growth is comparable to the XBB.1.9+S:F486P one (likely slower than .1 faster than .2 but that could be influenced by importation rates, especially in a not so big country as Denmark)
Covspectrum tools: https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/Denmark/AllSamples/Past3M/variants?aaMutations=S%3A486P&nextcladePangoLineage=XBB.1*&nucMutations1=C6016T%2CA12162G%2CC24134A&analysisMode=CompareToBaseline&
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: