Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added cowsql.spec.in for rpmbuild #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

nanjj
Copy link
Contributor

@nanjj nanjj commented Aug 25, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (563a0dd) 61.34% compared to head (e724256) 61.34%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #7   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.34%   61.34%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        6816     6816           
  Branches     2024     2024           
=======================================
  Hits         4181     4181           
  Misses       1347     1347           
  Partials     1288     1288           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@freeekanayaka
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution.

I'm not totally sure we want to have packaging-related files in this upstream repository. For example, the Debian packaging files are going to be kept here https://salsa.debian.org/freee/cowsql.

@stgraber do you have any take? I believe you'd like to not add packaging info to incus upstream repot as well.

@nanjj what's your goal? Do you want to officially package cowsql for a specific GNU/Linux distribution or do you want to build a cowsql package for yourself?

@stgraber
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I usually prefer the upstream repo to not have any packaging files as those usually need to be adapted to every distro and release anyway.

We do have a spec file in LXC but that predates me leading the project and has caused issues in the past as none of us know what to do with it, yet some people expect it to work ;)

@nanjj
Copy link
Contributor Author

nanjj commented Aug 29, 2023

Thanks for your contribution.

I'm not totally sure we want to have packaging-related files in this upstream repository. For example, the Debian packaging files are going to be kept here https://salsa.debian.org/freee/cowsql.

@stgraber do you have any take? I believe you'd like to not add packaging info to incus upstream repot as well.

@nanjj what's your goal? Do you want to officially package cowsql for a specific GNU/Linux distribution or do you want to build a cowsql package for yourself?

@nanjj nanjj closed this Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants