[inplace.vector.overview] Constexpr iterator requirements #7138
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use the same wording in `inplace_vector` that we already use in `array` and `vector`. (Note that `array<T,N>` is exactly isomorphic to `inplace_vector<T,N>` in this respect.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use the same wording in
inplace_vectorthat we already use inarrayandvector. (Note thatarray<T,N>is exactly isomorphic toinplace_vector<T,N>in this respect.)Here @jwakely writes "LWG spent a lot of time on that sentence, please don't change it editorially" — but I think he must be thinking of some other sentence, surely? I can't see any reason for this sentence to differ in formulation from the existing sentences in [array] and [vector]. So I'm adding jwakely as a reviewer on this PR... er, I guess I hope someone will add him, since I guess I can't.