Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Faster dec128 fast #658

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Faster dec128 fast #658

merged 11 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

mborland
Copy link
Member

Closes: #656

Provides 2.375x speedup vs develop and 3.236x speedup vs decimal128

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.5%. Comparing base (c7aed9d) to head (3c87b81).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #658     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     98.5%   98.5%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files          221     221             
  Lines        15696   15661     -35     
  Branches      1723    1722      -1     
=========================================
- Hits         15452   15416     -36     
- Misses         244     245      +1     
Files Coverage Δ
include/boost/decimal/decimal128_fast.hpp 97.0% <100.0%> (-0.7%) ⬇️
include/boost/decimal/detail/add_impl.hpp 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7aed9d...3c87b81. Read the comment docs.

@mborland mborland merged commit d7cc1d3 into develop Jun 17, 2024
62 checks passed
@mborland mborland deleted the faster_dec128_fast branch June 17, 2024 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Apply fast type optimizations to decimal128_fast
1 participant