150 update implemented metrics readme

[victornoel]

This is for #150

I tracked the references in the tickets where the metrics were introduced, and since some of them had no available pdf on the web, I decided to directly link the pdf in this repository instead.

So I applied the same to all other metrics as well as fixed markdown and other errors.

The README can be seen rendered here: https://github.com/victornoel/jpeek/tree/150-update-implemented-metrics-readme

[0crat]

This pull request #435 is assigned to @fanifieiev/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[fanifieiev]

@0crat refuse

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@fanifieiev The user @fanifieiev/z resigned from #435, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@fanifieiev Job refused in 0 hours - no penalty, see §6

[0crat]

This pull request #435 is assigned to @Vatavuk/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[Vatavuk]

@paulodamaso should we close #433 ?

[Vatavuk]

@paulodamaso ping

[paulodamaso]

@Vatavuk Please go on with this review, I've closed #433

[Vatavuk]

@victornoel one comment

[Vatavuk]

@victornoel I believe it should be we've already implemented

[victornoel]

@Vatavuk both are correct english, but I will change, it is same the for me :)

[victornoel]

@Vatavuk thanks, it is done

[Vatavuk]

@paulodamaso good to merge

[paulodamaso]

@victornoel build is failing (?) please take a look

[victornoel]

@paulodamaso clearly this is not related to the content of this PR, there seem to be an error with the maven build… maybe it is a transient error? Could you try re-trigger the build?

[paulodamaso]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 16min)

[0crat]

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @Vatavuk/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[sereshqua]

@Vatavuk please make sure you will find at least 3 issues during next CR; also, keep in mind that these have to be design problems, but not rather cosmetic issues like localisation

[Vatavuk]

@sereshqua ok

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality acceptable

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality acceptable

[victornoel]

@sereshqua actually it worked, it is as @g4s8 said in https://github.com/zerocracy/farm/issues/2252, it should be fixed the next time you get a QA job :)

[sereshqua]

@victornoel do you mean QA label or?

should NOT we see smth like this already?

[0crat]

@0crat quality acceptable (here)

@sereshqua There is no quality review for #435, no performer

[victornoel]

@victornoel do you mean QA label or?

should NOT we see smth like this already?

@sereshqua well, not here, because the QA here happened before the fix was merged

[sereshqua]

@victornoel look at above, I think now it is working properly :D

[victornoel]

@sereshqua ah yes, very cool :)