-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#413 support overloading in graph construction #439
Conversation
This pull request #439 is assigned to @Vatavuk/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso good to merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HDouss There is one comment, please take a look
caller.connections().add(callee); | ||
callee.connections().add(caller); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return new ListOf<>(byxml.values()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Serialize method call to a string. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HDouss I think that these two private methods could be extracted into two new classes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulodamaso I left a new puzzle for that.
@paulodamaso ping |
@HDouss Thanks you! |
@rultor merge |
@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 19min) |
Job was finished in 28 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36) |
@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @Vatavuk/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
@0crat quality bad |
Quality is low, no payment, see §31 |
Resolving issue #413
Add a puzzle to reenable tests after #437 is resolved.