Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#413 support overloading in graph construction #439

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 6, 2020
Merged

Conversation

HDouss
Copy link
Contributor

@HDouss HDouss commented Apr 5, 2020

Resolving issue #413
Add a puzzle to reenable tests after #437 is resolved.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 5, 2020

This pull request #439 is assigned to @Vatavuk/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

Copy link

@Vatavuk Vatavuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paulodamaso good to merge

Copy link
Collaborator

@paulodamaso paulodamaso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@HDouss There is one comment, please take a look

caller.connections().add(callee);
callee.connections().add(caller);
}
}
}
return new ListOf<>(byxml.values());
}

/**
* Serialize method call to a string.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@HDouss I think that these two private methods could be extracted into two new classes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paulodamaso I left a new puzzle for that.

@HDouss
Copy link
Contributor Author

HDouss commented Apr 6, 2020

@paulodamaso ping

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@HDouss Thanks you!

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Apr 6, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 27d7bb1 into cqfn:master Apr 6, 2020
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Apr 6, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 19min)

@0crat 0crat added the qa label Apr 6, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 6, 2020

Job was finished in 28 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 6, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @Vatavuk/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Apr 6, 2020
@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality bad

@0crat 0crat added quality/bad and removed qa labels Apr 6, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 6, 2020

Quality is low, no payment, see §31

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants