-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v1.0.0 #15
Merged
Release v1.0.0 #15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contrary to the common belief, giving up copyright is not allowed in some countries. Thus CC0 license have following terms: many legal systems effectively prohibit any attempt by these owners to surrender rights automatically conferred by law, particularly moral rights, even when the author wishing to do so is well informed and resolute about doing so and contributing their work to the public domain. CC0 helps solve this problem by giving creators a way to waive all their copyright and related rights in their works to the fullest extent allowed by law CC0 is also discouraged by few parties since it lacks of patent rights waiver.[^1] Thus, I prefer permissive license like Apache-2.0. And Apache-2.0 license includes patent termination and indemnification provisions, which is good thing, so Apache-2.0 is also recommended by FSF over other lax permissive licenses. But since Apache-2.0 is not GPL-2.0 compatible, I'd recommend to dual-license under 'Apache-2.0 OR MIT' Closes #13 [^1]: https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/25/fedora_sours_on_creative_commons/
Moved explanations for arguments from README to help output of program. Translated explanations into English. Closes #10 Fun fact: Most comments were auto-generated with GitHub Copilot.
cr0sh
reviewed
Jul 8, 2023
Co-authored-by: Junghyun Nam <13118114+cr0sh@users.noreply.github.com>
cr0sh
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1. Relicense under 'Apache-2.0 OR MIT'
Contrary to the common belief, giving up copyright is not allowed in some countries. Thus CC0 license have following terms:
CC0 is also discouraged by few parties since it lacks of patent rights waiver.1 Thus, I prefer permissive license like Apache-2.0. And Apache-2.0 license includes patent termination and indemnification provisions, which is good thing, so Apache-2.0 is also recommended by FSF over other lax permissive licenses.
But since Apache-2.0 is not GPL-2.0 compatible, I'd recommend to dual-license under "Apache-2.0 OR MIT".
2. Update README, package manifest, and help message.
Moved explanations for arguments from README to help output of program. Translated explanations into English.
Click to see rendered README.md
Fun fact: Most comments were auto-generated with GitHub Copilot.
Closes #14
Closes #13
Closes #10
Footnotes
https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/25/fedora_sours_on_creative_commons/ ↩