Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pacemaker cookbook #17

Closed
wants to merge 51 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ovaistariq
Copy link

Fixes #16

  for RHEL platform_family
- Add the LICENSE file
- Add berks and test-kitchen config which are needed for cookbook
  testing
  platform_family. The version is kept at '0' on suse but on RHEL
version '1' is used.
- Reformat the template content
… corosync init script that was being setup for non-suse platforms only needs to be setup for debian based distros
…ore than 1 instances so that they can communicate with each other
contain shell escape sequence and parsing will fail.
Chef::Log.error("Global options needs to be a Hash of the format: { 'option' => 'value' }. Please set node['haproxy']['global_options'] accordingly.")
end

template "#{node['haproxy']['conf_dir']}/haproxy.cfg" do

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style/StringLiteralsInInterpolation: Prefer double-quoted strings inside interpolations.

@ovaistariq
Copy link
Author

@aspiers is there anything I can do here?

@ovaistariq
Copy link
Author

@aspiers this looks like its still blocked for some reason. Anything you want me to do here?

@rsalevsky
Copy link
Member

@ovaistariq As first step it would be create if you can fix all the hound style issues.

@aspiers
Copy link
Member

aspiers commented Oct 6, 2015

@ovaistariq I'm so sorry for the delay - I keep meaning to look at this but I've been really struggling with workload so keep having to postpone. @rsalevsky is right that it would be very helpful if you could fix the Hound CI style warnings; also I see that the branch now has conflicts so will need rebasing.

Also I have just submitted #30 which will help increase confidence that your changes won't introduce any regressions on our side.

@aspiers
Copy link
Member

aspiers commented Oct 7, 2015

#30 has now been merged so please rebase this PR on top of that to ensure the test suite gets run by Travis. Thanks again!

@rsalevsky rsalevsky closed this Mar 2, 2018
@rsalevsky
Copy link
Member

If this should be still interesting please rebase and reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants