Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

5.2, 3rd Paragraph #3

Closed
nathanhere opened this issue Dec 28, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

5.2, 3rd Paragraph #3

nathanhere opened this issue Dec 28, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels
review

Comments

@nathanhere
Copy link

Consider:
"If the properties of the block cipher hold, then solely within this stream, an attacker still wouldn't be able..."
@lvh
Copy link
Member

lvh commented Jan 3, 2014

Hm, that's harder to read for me. Did you find the original wording confusing, or just hard to parse?

There is definitely something awkward about that paragraph though. I've attempted to rewrite it, see referenced commit. Improvement?

lvh added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2014
@lvh
Reword why ECB ostensibly isn't that bad
25e273e 
Refs #3.
@lvh lvh added the review label Feb 8, 2014
@lvh lvh added this to the Public alpha 2 (v0.2.0) milestone Feb 22, 2014
@lvh
Copy link
Member

lvh commented Mar 21, 2014

I think the reffed comment addressed the issue, so I'm closing this. If you disagree, please don't hesitate to reopen.

@lvh lvh closed this as completed Mar 21, 2014
frewsxcv pushed a commit to frewsxcv/book that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2017
@steveklabnik
Merge pull request crypto101#3 from rust-lang/fix_travis
e2c4c89 
Install mdbook on travis
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lvh @nathanhere