Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create PSUADE MOAT method #61

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 27, 2017

Conversation

kbarnhart
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses issue #60 by creating a dakotathon implementation of the PSUADE MOAT method.

@mdpiper I've done my best to follow your prior work in developing tests. If there are standard method tests that I've missed, please let me know and I'll write them.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 31, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.84% when pulling 4e27f09 on kbarnhart:barnhark/create_psuade_moat_method into 6b240a4 on csdms:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 31, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.84% when pulling 278cf80 on kbarnhart:barnhark/create_psuade_moat_method into 6b240a4 on csdms:master.

@kbarnhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mdpiper I'm getting close to doing some additional work on Dakotathon (adding a calibration method).

Before I start I'd appreciate any feedback on how I implemented this method. Should I do the new method in a vastly different way?

@mdpiper
Copy link
Member

mdpiper commented Jul 26, 2017

@kbarnhart I'll start reviewing this PR this week. (I'm in the midst of writing a report for NSF due Friday.) I'm sorry I've taken so long in getting to this.

@kbarnhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mdpiper no worries. good luck with report!

@mdpiper
Copy link
Member

mdpiper commented Jul 27, 2017

@kbarnhart This PR looks great! I'll merge it. Thank you so much for contributing to this project!

@mdpiper mdpiper merged commit 9721e96 into csdms:master Jul 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants