You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Spurred on by info from @neonstalwart in this thread, we should revisit all the dojo plugins and update the dependencies to take advantage of the new finer grained modules in dojo 1.7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hence my comment that it's more like supporting 2 libraries rather than 2 versions of the same library. in my opinion, they're not nearly compatible enough to support both as "dojo". you'd need to have specific "dojo16" plugins for just dojo 1.6 and then i'd suggest "dojo" would be for dojo 1.7+ or as @unscriptable says - declare that dojo 1.7 is the minimum you support.
That sounds good to me. I like the idea of providing dojo 1.6 and dojo 1.7 variants of the current wire/dojo/* plugins. We can let people know that all new dojo plugin dev will be for 1.7+. We can probably copy the existing plugins to a "wire/dojo16" dir, and then dojo 1.6 users can configure their loader to point wire/dojo to wire/dojo16 and not have to modify any of their wire specs.
Spurred on by info from @neonstalwart in this thread, we should revisit all the dojo plugins and update the dependencies to take advantage of the new finer grained modules in dojo 1.7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: