You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For these comparisons it may be helpful to exclude 2001 from the Gulf of Alaska design-based estimates as the entire eastern GOA was not sampled. Its good to use it in VAST though because it fills in the missing areas/depth strata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Excellent suggestion.
I can either: 1) Forego including 2001 in all future figures/summary comparisons, or 2) Add function argument for years to calc design-based index.
Preference?
Since its sort of special case for the GOA in one year, probably just
exclude 2001 from the design-based indices, unless a year function might
be useful for testing how many survey years make VAST useful? Like is it
any good if you just fit 2011-2015 for example?
Cheers,
Dana
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Curry J. Cunningham < ***@***.***> wrote:
Excellent suggestion.
I can either: 1) Forego including 2001 in all future figures/summary
comparisons, or 2) Add function argument for years to calc design-based
index.
Preference?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGUGxt6ubeWxmVtsTDJvHKRgRXCfGPXfks5rupB9gaJpZM4M5Qti>
.
For these comparisons it may be helpful to exclude 2001 from the Gulf of Alaska design-based estimates as the entire eastern GOA was not sampled. Its good to use it in VAST though because it fills in the missing areas/depth strata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: