Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add method forUpdate #465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2024
Merged

Add method forUpdate #465

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2024

Conversation

msmakouz
Copy link
Member

What was changed

The new method forUpdate has been added to the repository.

@msmakouz msmakouz added the type:feature New feature. label Feb 22, 2024
@msmakouz msmakouz self-assigned this Feb 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (230dc9f) 91.49% compared to head (79f691b) 91.50%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.x     #465   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.49%   91.50%           
- Complexity     1813     1814    +1     
=========================================
  Files           115      115           
  Lines          4596     4600    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits           4205     4209    +4     
  Misses          391      391           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@msmakouz msmakouz merged commit 9ce5e6f into 2.x Mar 29, 2024
42 checks passed
@msmakouz msmakouz deleted the for-update branch March 29, 2024 09:33
@hiscaler
Copy link

What does this method do?

@roxblnfk
Copy link
Member

roxblnfk commented May 15, 2024

adds FOR UPDATE when you build SELECT query
https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/select-for-update/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:feature New feature.
Projects
Status: Released
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants