Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Send Progrock updates to Cloud #5297

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023
Merged

Send Progrock updates to Cloud #5297

merged 24 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

vito
Copy link
Contributor

@vito vito commented Jun 7, 2023

This is an incremental step that maintains compatibility with the Dagger Cloud API:

  • Progrock Groups are mapped to their equivalent pipeline paths.
  • Vertex <-> Group membership is handled client-side; an Op will be emitted for every the first group membership as soon as both pieces of information are known.

In the long run we might want to store groups as first-class entities in Cloud to aid with querying and knowing the actual start/end of a pipeline, but that's a bigger lift.

It also:

  • Removes all of the pre-Progrock progress infra, so we're no longer injecting pipeline paths into Buildkit ProgressGroups
  • Updates our one-off tools (cmd/{upload-journal,dagger-graph,otel-collector}) - though I fully admit I haven't tested these
  • Adds the cloud URL and engine name to the TUI

Fixes DAG-1087

@vito vito force-pushed the cloud-progrock branch 2 times, most recently from c007389 to 00aa067 Compare June 9, 2023 20:01
@vito vito marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2023 20:08
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vito vito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ready for review! Did a review of my own and left some comments below, hope it helps.

Name: pipelineName,
})
ctx, subRecorder := progrock.WithGroup(ctx, pipelineName)
ctx, subRecorder := progrock.WithGroup(ctx, fmt.Sprintf("from %s", addr), progrock.Weak())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Marking a pipeline as "weak" allows us to differentiate these implicitly-added pipelines from explicit user-configured ones.

Pipeline pipeline.Path
}

func (r PipelineMetaResolver) ResolveImageConfig(ctx context.Context, ref string, opt llb.ResolveImageConfigOpt) (digest.Digest, []byte, error) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is handled by (core.GatewayClient).ResolveImageConfig now.

@@ -1110,7 +1079,7 @@ func (container *Container) WithExec(ctx context.Context, gw bkgw.Client, progSo
// create /dagger mount point for the shim to write to
runOpts = append(runOpts,
llb.AddMount(metaMountDestPath,
llb.Scratch().File(meta, pipeline.CustomName{Name: "creating dagger metadata", Internal: true}.LLBOpt(), container.Pipeline.LLBOpt()),
llb.Scratch().File(meta, llb.WithCustomName("[internal] creating dagger metadata")),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the one spot where we want to mark a Buildkit vertex as "internal." We don't need to shove the whole pipeline path in there anymore, so I swapped it out for a [internal] prefix, which gets stripped off and turned into internal: true during the Buildkit => Progrock conversion.

@@ -256,18 +256,15 @@ func (dir *Directory) WithNewFile(ctx context.Context, dest string, content []by

parent, _ := path.Split(dest)
if parent != "" {
st = st.File(llb.Mkdir(parent, 0755, llb.WithParents(true)), dir.Pipeline.LLBOpt())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't need to pass pipeline info to Buildkit anymore; group <-> vertex membership is handled by core.GatewayClient.

@@ -64,9 +64,6 @@ func loadRootLabels(workdir, engineName string) []Label {
return labels
}

// ServiceHostnameLabel is annotated on all services started by Dagger.
const ServiceHostnameLabel = "dagger.io/service.hostname"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This originally existed so we can detect service vertices and treat them differently, which shouldn't be needed once we convert it to the gateway. I don't think this ended up being load-bearing, so just removing it along the way.

@@ -383,58 +334,6 @@ func eventsMultiReader(ch chan *bkclient.SolveStatus, readers ...chan *bkclient.
}
}

func uploadTelemetry(ch chan *bkclient.SolveStatus) error {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has moved to telemetry.Writer.

vito added 19 commits June 15, 2023 16:39
This is an incremental step that maintains compatibility with the Dagger
Cloud API.

Groups are mapped to pipeline paths. (TODO: pipeline descriptions are
currently droped.)

Vertex <-> Group membership is handled client-side; an Op will be
emitted for every group membership.

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
this was copy-pasta from Bass, not intended to be preserved in Dagger

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
this is used for engine logs - need to dedupe these, or maybe use one in
the other

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
'weak' pipelines are ones that Dagger automatically adds, or a Buildkit
frontend adds via a ProgressGroup. They are treated differently from
user-specified pipelines.

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Too difficult to figure out many-to-many vertex <-> groups in the
frontend. This is much simpler for now.

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
* remove JournalWriter (unused)
* remove internal/engine/journal/ (outdated)

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
* add telemetry.Pipeliner for tying vertices to pipeline.Paths

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
trivial now that there's telemetry.Writer

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
We're no longer putting this information into Buildkit, so the console
output no longer shows pipelines and such. To be clear, this format was
always a bit janky, often resulting in things like blank vertex names.
These tests can be brought back once Progrock has a proper console
output format.

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
this was a temporary hack to show the Dagger Cloud URL in the TUI. will
figure this out in a separate PR.

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
no need to tie this 100% to Buildkit events, in case we want to create
any other vertexes

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
* --silent no longer configures console output format, which was frankly
  confusing. --progress has been added instead.
* removed buildkit console format; we are now 100% Progrock!
* show Cloud URL and engine name in TUI

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
the Progrock socket should always be available, so this is pretty
pointless anyway

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
vito added 2 commits June 15, 2023 16:39
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@sipsma sipsma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, super minor comments/questions

t.mu.Lock()
defer t.mu.Unlock()
if t.token != "" {
// no token; don't send telemetry
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this comment supposed to be outside this if?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed! Not sure what happened here, probably inverted the conditional or something.

if !silent {
if progress == "auto" && autoTTY || progress == "tty" {
if interactive {
return interactiveTUI(ctx, engineConf, fn)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we not set the EngineName and CloudURL callbacks for the interactive TUI? If so, is that just an oversight or is it because we'll need more updates to display those in the interactive tui? Not a big deal either way, just checking

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs more updates; will probably do it in another PR as this one's already grown quite a bit.

if group.Parent != nil {
parentPath, found := t.pipelinePaths[group.GetParent()]
if found {
path = append(path, parentPath...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extreme nit, probably separate issue if one at all: is there harm in changing pipeline.Path to be type []*Pipeline? It just looks like we are using quadratic memory here by re-copying each parent path, which I guess could plausibly matter in extreme scenarios with many long pipelines.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done! I don't think this matters too much since it only happens when a group starts or finishes, and the largest chunk of data (Labels) is already by-reference, but it's a tiny tweak and every bit helps.

vito added 2 commits June 16, 2023 09:38
pretty tiny change that should reduce some memory pressure, since each
of these values never change. (this likely has very little actual
effect, just seems sensible.)

Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Suraci <suraci.alex@gmail.com>
@vito vito merged commit 7d1c04a into dagger:main Jun 16, 2023
21 checks passed
@vito vito deleted the cloud-progrock branch June 16, 2023 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants