R1CS -> BP without using matrices [WIP] #131
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hdevalence
reviewed
Aug 3, 2018
src/circuit_proof/examples.rs
Outdated
| val_in_1: Scalar, | ||
| val_out_0: Scalar, | ||
| val_out_1: Scalar, | ||
| ) -> (ConstraintSystem, Scalar) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If the merge block is a circuit gadget, shouldn't it take a &mut ConstraintSystem as an input rather than returning one that it created? Since we don't have a way to combine constraint systems (and I don't think there's a good way to do that), doesn't constructing internally and returning the ConstraintSystem prevent joining two merge gadgets?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah that definitely makes more sense - fixed!
|
Closing: moving work to this PR: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: update
LinearConstraintso it uses a commitment to 1 instead of requiring a separate scalar?