Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test coverage with coveralls more flexible [#34] #65

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2016

Conversation

danactive
Copy link
Owner

@danactive danactive commented Dec 10, 2016

Review steps:

  • CLI yarn test:ci in Travis CI

@danactive danactive added this to the Build - CI milestone Dec 10, 2016
@danactive danactive self-assigned this Dec 10, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 10, 2016

Your pull request doesn't follow our guidelines. Please fix the following:

  • Pull request description must include verification steps (?)

Click here for details.

Thank you! 🙏

This comment was made by GitMagic – Magically enforcing your contribution guidelines.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 10, 2016

Thank you, the title and description now looks good! :bowtie:

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.811% when pulling 685c9b1 on add-test-coverage into fcae8ba on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.811% when pulling c439e8c on add-test-coverage into fcae8ba on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.811% when pulling a294c5c on add-test-coverage into fcae8ba on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.811% when pulling 4319f77 on add-test-coverage into fcae8ba on master.

@danactive danactive merged commit b635534 into master Dec 10, 2016
@danactive danactive deleted the add-test-coverage branch December 10, 2016 23:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants