License #38
Comments
|
My understanding is that all non-research uses of DunedinPACE must be
approved by TruDiagnostics, which holds the exclusive commercial license
for DunedinPACE.
If you can provide some details about your use case, I can bring the issue
to the IP Office at Duke, which manages the license.
Dan
…On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 3:40 PM u66u ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello and big thanks for your amazing work!
To clarify about the license: is it permitted to use the algorithm to
provide free dunedinPace results to people who bring their own data?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMXCHPXKJPXPXB4JUDTH7ZLZAPR4HAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGBWR62VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGI3TQMZRGMZDQNY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
If I am not missing anything the repository currently seems to have a contradiction between GNU GPL license (the LICENSE file in the repository), and the notice at the beginning of the README file. |
|
Hi Karolis,
Thanks for your interest!
Can you say a bit more? I am not sure I follow
Dan
…On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 2:59 PM Karolis Koncevičius ***@***.***> wrote:
If I am not missing anything the repository currently seems to have a
contradiction between GNU GPL license (the LICENSE file in the repository),
and the notice at the beginning of the README file.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMXCHPQ4MKND2WL2PYQIAUTZGNIBXAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGBWR62VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJWGE2DCMJYGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Hi Dan, The repository has a LICENSE file, which holds GNU General Public License v3. As a result this license is applied to the current repository and is, for example, also listed under the "About" section on the right side bar. GNU GPL license is a license saying that every user has a right to do whatever he or she wants with the source code, with the main requirement being that all modifications of the source code also adhere to GNU GPL license. By contrast the statement in the README says that commercial users cannot use the clock without permission from the licensee. Hence a contradiction. I am not a lawyer and this is not my expertise, but seems like currently the license and the statement disagree with each other. In short - you might want to modify/change the LICENSE file. |
|
Thanks for the heads up! We will review this with the Duke legal team
overseeing the license.
Dan
…On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 3:11 PM Karolis Koncevičius ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Dan,
The repository has a LICENSE file, which holds GNU General Public License
v3. As a result this license is applied to the current repository and is,
for example, also listed under the "About" section on the right side bar.
GNU GPL license is a license saying that every user has a right to do
whatever he or she wants with the source code, with the main requirement
being that all modifications of the source code also adhere to GNU GPL
license. By contrast the statement in the README says that commercial users
cannot use the clock without permission from the licensee.
Hence a contradiction. I am not a lawyer and this is not my expertise, but
seems like currently the license and the statement disagree with each
other. In short - you might want to modify/change the LICENSE file.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMXCHPXV75RKD35QFINN3CDZGNJNHAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGBWR62VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJWGE2DIOBTGM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hello and big thanks for your amazing work!
To clarify about the license: is it permitted to use the algorithm to provide free dunedinPace results to people who bring their own data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: