Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(13.5.0) INFRASYS-7453: re-implement wait times #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2016
Merged

(13.5.0) INFRASYS-7453: re-implement wait times #32

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2016

Conversation

nz285
Copy link
Contributor

@nz285 nz285 commented Jul 1, 2016

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 6, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.1%) to 97.318% when pulling f5c9cf2 on nz285:INFRASYS-7453 into f8fe5b7 on dandb:master.

sbraverman
sbraverman reviewed Jul 7, 2016
View reviewed changes
License2Deploy/rolling_deploy.py
deployObj.deploy()

if __name__ == "__main__": # pragma: no cover
main()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please keep the new line here

@sbraverman
Copy link
Contributor

+9 with small changes and dependency added to setup.py

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 7, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.1%) to 97.318% when pulling 1b60f06 on nz285:INFRASYS-7453 into f8fe5b7 on dandb:master.

@sbraverman sbraverman changed the title INFRASYS-7453: re-implement wait times (13.5.0) INFRASYS-7453: re-implement wait times Jul 8, 2016
@sbraverman sbraverman merged commit e758d67 into dandb:master Jul 8, 2016
@nz285 nz285 mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2016
Closed
@nz285 nz285 deleted the INFRASYS-7453 branch July 8, 2016 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@nz285 @coveralls @sbraverman