New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate and consume the package spec (.packages) #23372

Closed
sethladd opened this Issue May 4, 2015 · 22 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@sethladd
Member

sethladd commented May 4, 2015

This is the main tracking bug to implement the package spec proposal. This proposal has been accepted (but has not yet gone through TC52), and work has begun on implementing it.

This is the main tracking bug. Each platform's specific bug is below:

Note that additional work will be needed in phase 2, see #24112

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 4, 2015

Member

Marked this as being blocked by #23373.

Member

sethladd commented May 4, 2015

Marked this as being blocked by #23373.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 4, 2015

Member

Marked this as being blocked by #23374.

Member

sethladd commented May 4, 2015

Marked this as being blocked by #23374.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 4, 2015

Member

Added Accepted label.

Member

sethladd commented May 4, 2015

Added Accepted label.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 4, 2015

Member

See also this JetBrains plugin tracking issue: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WEB-16466

Member

sethladd commented May 4, 2015

See also this JetBrains plugin tracking issue: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WEB-16466

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 7, 2015

Member

Added this to the 1.11 milestone.
Added Priority-High label.

Member

sethladd commented May 7, 2015

Added this to the 1.11 milestone.
Added Priority-High label.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd
Member

sethladd commented May 13, 2015

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd May 19, 2015

Member

Added Started label.

Member

sethladd commented May 19, 2015

Added Started label.

@sigmundch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sigmundch

sigmundch Jun 1, 2015

Member

Marked this as blocking #23565.

Member

sigmundch commented Jun 1, 2015

Marked this as blocking #23565.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd Jun 11, 2015

Member

dart2js has filed their merge request for this new functionality.

Member

sethladd commented Jun 11, 2015

dart2js has filed their merge request for this new functionality.

@sethladd sethladd changed the title from Meta: Implementing package spec proposal to Meta: Implementing package spec proposal (.packages) Jun 11, 2015

@kevmoo kevmoo added the Area-NONE label Jun 17, 2015

@floitschG floitschG added Area-Meta and removed Area-NONE labels Jun 24, 2015

@nex3

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nex3

nex3 Jun 29, 2015

Member

Since I don't see it linked anywhere here, the issue tracking the VM's implementation is #23369.

Member

nex3 commented Jun 29, 2015

Since I don't see it linked anywhere here, the issue tracking the VM's implementation is #23369.

@nex3 nex3 changed the title from Meta: Implementing package spec proposal (.packages) to Generate and consume the package spec (.packages) Jul 2, 2015

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd
Member

sethladd commented Jul 8, 2015

Blocked by dart-lang/pub#1294

@nex3

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nex3

nex3 Jul 8, 2015

Member

@sethladd When adding new sub-issues to meta-issues, it would be nice to include them in the master list as well (I've done so for this one).

Member

nex3 commented Jul 8, 2015

@sethladd When adding new sub-issues to meta-issues, it would be nice to include them in the master list as well (I've done so for this one).

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd Jul 8, 2015

Member

Sure. I didn't know if you wanted blockers that came up after we filed the meta issue, since they weren't original implementation issues.

Member

sethladd commented Jul 8, 2015

Sure. I didn't know if you wanted blockers that came up after we filed the meta issue, since they weren't original implementation issues.

@nex3

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nex3

nex3 Jul 8, 2015

Member

I think the main function of the meta-issue is to give people a single place to see "what is the current status of X", so having everything in the main list is a good idea. I'll mention it in the wiki entry.

Member

nex3 commented Jul 8, 2015

I think the main function of the meta-issue is to give people a single place to see "what is the current status of X", so having everything in the main list is a good idea. I'll mention it in the wiki entry.

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd Jul 8, 2015

Member

sgtm!

Member

sethladd commented Jul 8, 2015

sgtm!

@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 17, 2015

Member

Meta bug, assigning to self to drive to completion for 1.12.

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 17, 2015

Meta bug, assigning to self to drive to completion for 1.12.

@mit-mit mit-mit self-assigned this Aug 17, 2015

@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 18, 2015

Member

Marking #23373 as complete in checlist

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 18, 2015

Marking #23373 as complete in checlist

@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 18, 2015

Member

Moved #24093 to 1.13

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 18, 2015

Moved #24093 to 1.13

@mit-mit mit-mit referenced this issue Aug 18, 2015

Closed

.packages: Eliminate symlinks, phase two #24112

8 of 8 tasks complete
@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 18, 2015

Member

Created a new issue #24112 to tracks the second phase for this feature targeted for 1.13. Deleting 1.13 work items from present issue that is bound to 1.12.

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 18, 2015

Created a new issue #24112 to tracks the second phase for this feature targeted for 1.13. Deleting 1.13 work items from present issue that is bound to 1.12.

@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 19, 2015

Member

Marking testing task complete as #24092 was closed.

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 19, 2015

Marking testing task complete as #24092 was closed.

@mit-mit

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mit-mit

mit-mit Aug 19, 2015

Member

Marking this feature complete for 1.12. We will expand on this in 1.13, see #24112

Member

mit-mit commented Aug 19, 2015

Marking this feature complete for 1.12. We will expand on this in 1.13, see #24112

@mit-mit mit-mit closed this Aug 19, 2015

@sethladd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sethladd

sethladd Aug 19, 2015

Member

Note, there are many open issues around the implementation of this feature. A sample:

#24126
#24127
#24122
#24116

Member

sethladd commented Aug 19, 2015

Note, there are many open issues around the implementation of this feature. A sample:

#24126
#24127
#24122
#24116

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment