-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace msgpack-python by msgpack #1927
Conversation
This looks fine to me. cc local packaging expert, @jakirkham |
Hmmm not sure about the CI failures, I'll need to investigate but I'll retrigger the CIs just in case. After opening the PR, I realised that msgpack was not available through conda at the moment. There is an issue in conda-forge related to this renaming conda-forge/msgpack-python-feedstock#5. |
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ call deactivate | |||
joblib ^ | |||
jupyter_client ^ | |||
mock ^ | |||
msgpack-python ^ | |||
msgpack ^ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this part is using conda
where it is still named msgpack-python
. Seems to be causing the CI failure. Reverting this part should fix that issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have guessed this is only used in Windows though, so that does not really explain the Travis failure. I pushed the change anyway.
Yeah the package is not likely to be renamed in |
Thanks for the details. I am wondering how this is going to pan out with the change of name in PyPI and the entry point issue detailed in #1913. If you have some suggestions on whether #1913 can be solved in setup.py I am interested. |
Right so as often I did not look thoroughly enough in the existing issues and it turns out there is already a PR for that. Closing in favour of #1794. |
This is the new name of the package on PyPI
msgpack not available through conda at the time of writing
Is this ok to go in? cc @jakirkham |
Thanks @lesteve. :) |
Now wondering if that was a question for me or @lesteve. Sorry if I merged early. |
This was fine to merge as far as I was concerned. I may try to do the renaming on the conda-forge side at one point. |
Great. Glad that this is in. Thanks @lesteve ! |
There is a already a conda-forge PR. Once that’s merged, the work-around here can probably be simplified. |
Agreed, once conda-forge/msgpack-python-feedstock#7 is merged, we can go back to using conda to install msgpack-python on AppVeyor. |
This is the new name of the package on PyPI. The msgpack-python PyPI page says "This package is deprecated. Install msgpack instead."
This may just fix #1913 as mentioned in #1913 (comment).
Close #1794.