Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

undefined method `peek=' for #<Gmail> #42

Closed
ShockwaveNN opened this issue Oct 15, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

undefined method `peek=' for #<Gmail> #42

ShockwaveNN opened this issue Oct 15, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@ShockwaveNN
Copy link

When I try to user 'peek' function I got an exception.
I can't find this method on rdoc documentation, but in github main page this function is present on tutorial.
Does that function still present in code by different name?

@myobie
Copy link
Collaborator

myobie commented Dec 19, 2012

Is this an issue on version 0.3.0 or master?

@joshaven
Copy link
Collaborator

I am sorry, I really don't know anything about this project. The developer
died a few years ago. There are some people that have edit rights so they
may be making updates and would defiantly have better info then I do for
you.

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Nathan wrote:

Is this an issue on version 0.3.0 or master?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/42#issuecomment-11513834.

"Without our utmost care and diligence in the investigation of the truth,
we must be contented to walk in the shades of ignorance and error." - John
Owen 1678

@myobie
Copy link
Collaborator

myobie commented Dec 19, 2012

I have edit rights and I just pushed a new version. I am going through the issues trying to figure out which ones still apply. If you don't have any info about this I can close this ticket out.

@wengzilla
Copy link
Contributor

I've confirmed that the peek is indeed an attr_accessor and the functionality appears to be working on master. We should look at closing this ticket out.

@myobie myobie closed this as completed Jan 24, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants