Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for FEEvaluationShift with FE_Q and FE_DGQ #14131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 22, 2022

Conversation

bergbauer
Copy link
Contributor

Request from #14119 (review)

@bergbauer bergbauer changed the title Add test for FEEvaluationShift with FE_Q Add test for FEEvaluationShift with FE_Q and FE_DGQ Jul 14, 2022
@peterrum
Copy link
Member

/rebuild

@tamiko
Copy link
Member

tamiko commented Jul 16, 2022

/rebuild

Comment on lines +133 to +139
if (shape_info != nullptr)
{
AssertDimension(shape_info->n_q_points, this->data->n_q_points);
AssertDimension(shape_info->dofs_per_component_on_cell,
this->data->dofs_per_component_on_cell);
this->data = shape_info;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're not using this path of the code, do you? Do you want to extend the test to also make use of a ShapeInfo evaluated outside of the cell?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this is a good idea!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated!

@kronbichler kronbichler merged commit bf0e3ce into dealii:master Jul 22, 2022
mkghadban pushed a commit to OpenFCST/dealii that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Add test for FEEvaluationShift with FE_Q and FE_DGQ
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants