Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for conditional logic following the ConditionalProof specification #133

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
May 9, 2023

Conversation

theblockstalk
Copy link
Contributor

Adds the ability to issue and verify VCs with multi-signatures and delegated signatures and combinations of the two, against DIDs that follow the ConditionalProof specification. See decentralized-identity/did-jwt#272

https://github.com/w3c-ccg/verifiable-conditions

Copy link
Member

@mirceanis mirceanis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
There's a new method without an implementation which should be removed before merging this.

src/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mirceanis
Copy link
Member

Looks like there's a benign failure in the linter.
Can you please run yarn lint --fix and push the results?

Copy link
Member

@mirceanis mirceanis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks for adding this!

@mirceanis mirceanis merged commit 6cc9bed into decentralized-identity:master May 9, 2023
uport-automation-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
# [3.2.0](3.1.4...3.2.0) (2023-05-09)

### Features

* support credentials using ConditionalProof2022 ([#133](#133)) ([6cc9bed](6cc9bed))
@uport-automation-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants