-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Need to implement a reason for proposal censorship #97
Comments
I am ok adding this. The reason I didn't add this during development is that reasons can be misinterpreted and often are. Not providing a reason prevents a semantic argument. |
On Reddit when I want to include a reason for censorship I have to use regular comments. Semantically moderation discussion is "meta" to the thread and should be separate. And more generally, there can be more than 1 message in the "moderation stream". Even more generally, there can be two streams: one visible to all, and one to admins only. |
* add edit icon * sneak in prop type check fix for messages
They are no longer necessary.
@davecgh mentioned this has been discussed, so I'm just creating an issue to capture it.
Currently there is no support for the admin providing a reason to the user for censoring a proposal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: