Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(fs): check ensureDir() is not racy #5086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

kt3k
Copy link
Member

@kt3k kt3k commented Jun 19, 2024

This PR adds a check for #3233

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fs label Jun 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.43%. Comparing base (6c598d5) to head (068691b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5086   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.43%   92.43%           
=======================================
  Files         481      481           
  Lines       38746    38746           
  Branches     5449     5449           
=======================================
  Hits        35813    35813           
  Misses       2878     2878           
  Partials       55       55           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title test(fs): check ensureDir is not racy test(fs): check ensureDir() is not racy Jun 19, 2024
@iuioiua
Copy link
Contributor

iuioiua commented Jun 19, 2024

Nice! Are there other APIs we should do this for?

@kt3k kt3k merged commit ec27c49 into denoland:main Jun 19, 2024
16 checks passed
@kt3k kt3k deleted the check-ensure-dir-is-not-racy branch June 19, 2024 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants