Add bounds checks to radec_to_desiname

[weaverba137]

This PR closes #206.

In addition the test matrix is updated to bring the tests more in line with Jura (hence the oddball branch name).

[akremin]

Thank you for the quick fix, Ben. I am happy to accept your changes as-is but I left two things in-line for you to consider.

[coveralls]

coverage: 76.331% (+0.05%) from 76.284%
when pulling afea081 on numpy-1.23
into 3cb282b on main.

[akremin]

Thanks, my previous comments still remain after this update. You're welcome to ignore them if you wish. I have added one additional comment you can choose to address or not.

Feel free to accept or reject any of the three and merge if satisfied.

[weaverba137]

I will review those soon. I was just very busy debugging the tests yesterday.

[weaverba137]

@sbailey, there is a remaining question about how specific we want to make the error messages, for example not just saying "bad value found", but "25 instances of bad values of target_ra found, for example 375 at index 244 of target_ra".

It wouldn't necessarily be that hard to implement something like that, but why can't users just do that themselves?

[weaverba137]

Based on discussion with @sbailey yesterday, I think this can be merged in the current state. I will merge shortly unless there are further comments.

[sbailey]

Agreed, ok to merge.