update jitpack.io docs #519
Conversation
fixes #518
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Once I have a bit of time to move the project under "ghostdriver" organization, we will take care of changing this again.
For now, good stuff.
PS We should probably split this into 2 or 3 repositories, one with "ghostdriver-core", one with "npm ghostdriver" and one with "java phantomjsdriver bindings".
What do you think?
the "ghostdriver-core" and "java phantomjs bindings" both sound resonable. it would help reduce the confusion between the java client driver and the core ghostdriver code. having a separate project for the npm package would be a bit ackward. we would probably have to copy some of the source files or have a build process that copies the source files from "ghostdriver-core" and publishes to npm. |
fixes #518