-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature authorship: One per git project kind of sound supported? #178
Comments
Hey 👋 Thanks for highlighting this. As you discovered, the Dev Container CLI should be able to auto-detect and publish a single Feature if the repository is structured as such ref. That said, I just tested it out and it looks like the GitHub Action and the This is something we should fix across the set of the tools used for publishing and testing. I'll make issues and link to this one for you to track.
In the |
Thanks for the update! Looking forward to trying it out. For the auto-increment part of it, I'm a big +1 on giving workflow flexibility on this one, kind of like what helm cli does among others, where it will pickup version from specifications in some file, but that you can also provide yourself if you want the helm release tag to match a git project tag. That being said, I understand better now how the cli auto-handles publishing X.Y.Z, X.Y, and X automatically, and the advantages the collection part of it can bring. So that flexibility I had in mind in my initial post, is probably not as simple as I imagined. I'll just keep the sed way for now on that front and see how it goes in the future. |
Hello, I have been getting happily getting into Features and I have a few I want to create.
Now I try my best not to bundle parts of code together if they don't need to be. Divide to conquer kind of thing. So that's the angle I took first, trying to create one git project per feature, and use git tags as feature versions.
I got it working.. but it feels like I'm fighting against the system or I am not doing it right.
Any clarity on the above would be appreciated, here or maybe in the docs. I cannot be the only one that would naturally try to split those features into different projects :P
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: