Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(nns): Eliminate ExecutedCreateServiceNervousSystemProposal #1366

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

aterga
Copy link
Contributor

@aterga aterga commented Sep 5, 2024

This PR refactors the code in NNS Governance responsible for executing CreateServiceNervousSystem proposals s.t. it no longer requires the internal type ExecutedCreateServiceNervousSystemProposal. This type was intended to be internal but has become public for CLI tools to validate instances of this proposal type, which adds an undesirable crate-level dependency between, e.g., //rs/nns/governance and //rs/sns/init.

@aterga aterga marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2024 21:43
@aterga aterga requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2024 21:43
rs/sns/cli/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aterga aterga added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 6d16531 Sep 5, 2024
24 checks passed
@aterga aterga deleted the arshvair/executed-csns-side-quest branch September 5, 2024 23:34
levifeldman pushed a commit to levifeldman/ic that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
…dfinity#1366)

This PR refactors the code in NNS Governance responsible for executing
`CreateServiceNervousSystem` proposals s.t. it no longer requires the
internal type `ExecutedCreateServiceNervousSystemProposal`. This type
was intended to be internal but has become public for CLI tools to
validate instances of this proposal type, which adds an undesirable
crate-level dependency between, e.g., `//rs/nns/governance` and
`//rs/sns/init`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants