Add section on Deform to manual #46
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yes, to mark up |
| `d \times d`:math: matrices. | ||
| `d \times d`:math: matrices. More general, non-affine | ||
| transformations, including projective transformations, are referred to | ||
| in ``diagrams`` as `Deformations`_ |
|
Might also be nice to include a few example diagrams. Looks good to me other than that. |
|
I added a simple example. I want to add a more interesting example projecting 3D to 2D, but I need to write the code to support that first. |
byorgey
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2014
Add section on Deform to manual
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's some documentation to accompany diagrams/diagrams-lib#148 It at least explains the aspects of what's
Deformablethat gave me headaches writing the code.Is there a way to mark up
Transformations that will be linked correctly? Sometimes the plural is correct in the sentence, but when I place backticks in the obvious place, the .rst parsing shows them in the output HTML, and there's no link.