-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hook up geoservice client in gedbrowser #96
Comments
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2017
* Create a standalone application that is a geoservice client * Rearrange stuff so that the backup data types are now what is presented in the service * Rename types to be more reasonable for current usage
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2017
…nt-in-gedbrowser Issue #96 - hook up geoservice client in gedbrowser
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2017
* Fix the naming of a test class
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 15, 2017
All of the geo information is now in GeoJSON forms. The internal geometry description is now a Point (location) and 2 Features (bounds and viewport). The next step will be to make it be completely a Feature Collection. That will require turning the Point into a Feature with the Point and the location type (as a property).
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2017
All of the response data is now in the GeoJSON. However, I can't deserialize the Google data types if they are in a Feature.properties. So, I have that data redundantly in the response. For current semantics it's in the wrapper. Next steps is to make componentize the client. Use the application just to test the component. Eventually use that component in GedBrowser.
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2017
…nt-in-gedbrowser Issue #96 - Backed off a little on the GeoJSON
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2017
* This makes the client a consumable object * The geoservice client application is more robust for testing * I am holding back the actual use of the client in the gebrowser
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2017
…nt-in-gedbrowser Issue #96 - the geoservice can now be used by gedbrowser behaviors
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2017
* Clean up some warnings in tests * Make gedbrowser call geoservice for persons * Don't do family places yet. That can be a new issue. * Don't connect to the UI yet. That already is an issue.
dickschoeller
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2017
…nt-in-gedbrowser Issue #96 hook up geoservice client in gedbrowser
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: