Add BOT_HTTP_INTERACTIONS User flag #3903
Conversation
|
Would be nice to have some descriptive context to what this actually does. |
|
It will likely be used to show bots that only use interactions over HTTP as online in the client |
That doesn't sound like you know for sure. I think we should let discord document this or only PR this when we know for sure what it will actually do and not what we think it will do. |
Adds BotHttpInteractions with a value of 1<<19. See discord/discord-api-docs#3903
Adds BotHttpInteractions with a value of 1<<19. See discord/discord-api-docs#3903
typpo
added
the
not released
| @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ There are other rules and restrictions not shared here for the sake of spam and | |||
| | 1 << 16 | Verified Bot | | |||
| | 1 << 17 | Early Verified Bot Developer | | |||
| | 1 << 18 | Discord Certified Moderator | | |||
| | 1 << 19 | Bot HTTP Interactions | | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does Bot HTTP Interactions means? Even as someone who is used to the Discord API, I don't know what this means.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A bot that doesn't connect to the gateway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, I think I understand
A description like Bot using only [outgoing webook interactions](#DOCS_INTERACTIONS_RECEIVING_AND_RESPONDING/receiving-an-interaction) and always shown online (or something like that) is better in my mind :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gateway Status or Bot Status? O.o
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this table is pretty weird because instead of having an actual name field it has a "description" field which is generally pretty close to the name, and libraries usually just normalize the description for a name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, having both name and description could be useful
|
This appears to be showing up on bots now, it hides the bot's status and puts it in the online list: |
night
removed
the
not released
No description provided.