Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get transitive closure of types #229

Closed
reckart opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Get transitive closure of types #229

reckart opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@reckart
Labels
🆕Enhancement
Milestone
0.6.1

Comments

@reckart
Copy link
Member

reckart commented Sep 29, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Sometimes, I would like to get a minimal version of a type system containing only the types actually used in a given CAS.

Describe the solution you'd like
A utility method to obtain the transitive closure of a set of seed types from the current type system.
@reckart reckart added this to the 0.6.1 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@reckart reckart self-assigned this Sep 29, 2021
reckart added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
@reckart
#229 - Get transitive closure of types
d50efa4 
- Added utility method
- Added test
- Modernize tests
reckart added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
@reckart
Merge pull request #230 from dkpro/feature/229-Get-transitive-closure…
f91fced 
…-of-types

#229 - Get transitive closure of types
@reckart reckart closed this as completed Sep 29, 2021
reckart added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
@reckart
Merge branch 'main' into feature/168-Experimental-JSON-CAS-support
ebe2be2 
* main:
  #231 - cas_to_comparable_text breaks saying that FSes do not have an ID
  #229 - Get transitive closure of types
  #227 - If a CAS contains no text the offset mapping initialization fails
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@reckart reckart

Labels
🆕Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@reckart