Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly disallow the use of "alpine-pkg-glibc" #10794

Closed
tianon opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Explicitly disallow the use of "alpine-pkg-glibc" #10794

tianon opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Aug 26, 2021

This is definitely a piece of #6282, but in light of https://ariadne.space/2021/08/26/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-glibc-based-alpine-image/ (and https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/24647), we plan to enforce the no-glibc-in-Alpine-based-images (and even not mixing release pockets like 3.14 and edge) more strictly.

Fortunately, there are only two images which are currently using this:

Please make (short term) plans to either migrate off this solution or deprecate the affected image variants.

(See also #10779 (comment) for an example of a concrete issue with the usage of this in the context of Java.)

@tianon tianon mentioned this issue Aug 26, 2021
14 tasks
tianon added a commit to docker-library/dockerfile-validator that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2021
@J0WI
Copy link
Contributor

J0WI commented Aug 31, 2021

Question (maybe to @kaniini?): does this affect any image using the libc6-compat package or is this still an acceptable workaround?

@kaniini
Copy link

kaniini commented Aug 31, 2021

libc6-compat has largely been superseded by gcompat and needs to be retired, especially since musl no longer supports that hack

@jayasg12
Copy link
Contributor

jayasg12 commented Oct 1, 2021

Hi @tianon Is there a way to get stats of download for ibmjava Alpine images , so it helps us to take next step of action. Thanks !!

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Oct 26, 2021

@jayasg12 sorry for the delay -- per-tag stats is unfortunately not data we have access to 😞

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Apr 22, 2022

Closing this now as anything left is really part of #6282. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants