-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "add a 10s timeout to the client object." #1893
Conversation
This reverts commit 59defcb which caused docker#1892 since the timeout applied not only to the dial phase but to everything, so it would kill `docker logs -f ...` if the container was not chatty enough. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@docker.com>
I'll try and find another way to add a shorter timeout at |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1893 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 56.75% 56.75%
=======================================
Files 309 309
Lines 21680 21680
=======================================
Hits 12305 12305
Misses 8476 8476
Partials 899 899 |
Thanks. |
This helps to address docker/cli#1739, where an invalid `DOCKER_HOST` setting could result in a 64s delay (that's twice the delay here because the client was trying to hit the `/_ping` endpoint twice, which was addressed in moby/moby#39206) I made a previous attempt to fix this purely on the Docker cli side (docker/cli#1872) however that had the side effect of adding the timeout across the board and not just for the dial phase, which caused a regression for `docker logs -f` (docker/cli#1892) and so was reverted (docker/cli#1893). The new value of 10s is just based on a gut feeling, no initial connection should be taking that long in the real world unless something about the network link is pretty broken (e.g. bad dns perhaps), in which case affected users are surely pretty used to retrying things, better to fail faster in the normal case. Also drop the comment since the linked issue just shows that the original number, just like the new number, was arrived at fairly arbitrarily based on gut feelings (rather than anything empirical) so the reference is not really terribly useful. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@docker.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
ping @silvin-lubecki |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Dumb question but, can't we override the timeout just for the logs command? |
The way the I raised docker/go-connections#63 to fix the dial timeout at the source without affecting the post-connection operation. I think that's the way to go -- LGTMs over there appreciated ;-) |
(Removed the "cherry-pick" label, because this was not in the 19.03 branch) |
This reverts commit 59defcb (#1872) which caused #1892
since the timeout applied not only to the dial phase but to everything, so it
would kill
docker logs -f ...
if the container was not chatty enough.Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ijc@docker.com
fixes #1892
fixes docker/for-linux#669.