-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fill without rotation #56
Comments
One possible combination of sizes is 7x7 (40), 11x11 (92), and 13x13 (136) on one side, with 9x9 (68) and 15x15 (188) on the other with 3 unused tiles. |
Make a demo pair of 7x7 puzzles, then sets of 9x9 to 15x15, as well as pairs at each size. |
In addition to having bigger connecting tabs, font alignment will be more consistent without rotation. |
Use numpy to test all slots at once. Part of #56.
Combines fill() with random_fill(). Not sure if that's a good idea.
I think the connecting tabs can be bigger if the pieces don't need rotational symmetry.
See if packing can work without rotation.
See if a set of 4 or 5 different sizes can add up evenly with each puzzle on a single side.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: