Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shouldly 4.2.1 #8717

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

Shouldly 4.2.1 #8717

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

rainersigwald
Copy link
Member

Almost all changes are fallout from https://docs.shouldly.org/documentation/3to4#func-less-than-string-greater-than-custommessage-removed.

Fixes were: always materialize the string up front, and sometimes
explicitly specify customMessage: to disambiguate methods.

Almost all changes are fallout from https://docs.shouldly.org/documentation/3to4#func-less-than-string-greater-than-custommessage-removed.

Fixes were: always materialize the string up front, and sometimes
explicitly specify `customMessage:` to disambiguate methods.
@rainersigwald
Copy link
Member Author

Ugh. A change in Shouldly is making it do reference-equal equality for CopyOnWritePropertyDictionary_Tests.MockValue instead of using its IEquatable<CopyOnWritePropertyDictionary_Tests.MockValue> implementation: shouldly/shouldly#825. Easy enough to work around but not filling me with joy.

@JanKrivanek
Copy link
Member

Looks good (as soon as quite a few missing method exceptions ShouldNotBeNull(!!0, System.String) are tackled)

@AR-May
Copy link
Member

AR-May commented Oct 10, 2023

Let's time box it with 1 dev day.

@JaynieBai
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@GangWang01
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@GangWang01 GangWang01 assigned GangWang01 and unassigned JaynieBai Oct 24, 2023
@rainersigwald
Copy link
Member Author

Hey, this is green now, thanks @GangWang01! Should we undraft and review it?

@GangWang01
Copy link
Member

I think it's ready for review.

@GangWang01 GangWang01 marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2023 05:55
@rainersigwald
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM!

@rainersigwald rainersigwald merged commit 5348d60 into dotnet:main Oct 30, 2023
8 checks passed
@rainersigwald rainersigwald deleted the shouldly branch October 30, 2023 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants