Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port FxCop rule CA1412: MarkComSourceInterfacesAsIDispatch #428

Open
Tracked by #61964
ghost opened this issue Nov 21, 2015 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #61964

Port FxCop rule CA1412: MarkComSourceInterfacesAsIDispatch #428

ghost opened this issue Nov 21, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
Approved-Rule Indicates if the new proposed rule has been approved to move to implementation phase FxCop-Port help wanted The issue is up-for-grabs, and can be claimed by commenting Priority:3 Nice to have (suitable for disabled by default rules and ported FxCop rules)
Milestone

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 21, 2015

Title: Mark ComSource interfaces as IDispatch

Description:

A type is marked by using the System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComSourceInterfacesAttribute attribute, and at least one of the specified interfaces is not marked by using the System.Runtime.InteropServices.InterfaceTypeAttribute attribute set to ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIDispatch.

Dependency: None

Notes:

@jinujoseph jinujoseph added this to the Unknown milestone Nov 26, 2017
@Evangelink Evangelink added Approved-Rule Indicates if the new proposed rule has been approved to move to implementation phase help wanted The issue is up-for-grabs, and can be claimed by commenting labels Jan 7, 2022
@jeffhandley jeffhandley added the Priority:3 Nice to have (suitable for disabled by default rules and ported FxCop rules) label Jan 22, 2022
@jeffhandley jeffhandley modified the milestones: Unknown, .NET 7.x Jan 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approved-Rule Indicates if the new proposed rule has been approved to move to implementation phase FxCop-Port help wanted The issue is up-for-grabs, and can be claimed by commenting Priority:3 Nice to have (suitable for disabled by default rules and ported FxCop rules)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants