enable pre-built detection #6610

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-04-25T16:31:41Z

Resolves #6606

@dotnet/roslyn-analysis there are several exceptions that we ran into and would require help with. I will mention these in individual comments in the PR. Thanks!

Context for what and why of this PR and the linked issue - https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/blob/main/Documentation/eliminating-pre-builts.md

CC: @MichaelSimons @mmitche

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-04-25T16:32:46Z

eng/Versions.props

-    <SystemCollectionsImmutableExecutableVersion Condition="'$(SystemCollectionsImmutableExecutableVersion)' == ''">5.0.0</SystemCollectionsImmutableExecutableVersion>
-    <SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion>$(SystemReflectionMetadataVersion)</SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion>
-    <SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion Condition="'$(SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion)' == ''">5.0.0</SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion>
    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion Condition="'$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion)' == ''">3.8.0</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion>


As mentioned in the linked issue, for source-build we cannot utilize a ref pack for Microsoft.CodeAnalysis dependency versions.
Bumping even the minor version from 3.8.X to 3.9.X (or 3.7.X to 3.8.X which declared below) would result in build exceptions:

/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/AbstractRunIterations`1.cs(39,32): error CS8600: Converting null literal or possible null value to non-nullable type. [/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.csproj] /datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/AbstractRunIterations`1.cs(40,18): error CS8604: Possible null reference argument for parameter 'method' in 'bool IMethodSymbolExtensions.IsBenchmarkOrXUnitTestMethod(IMethodSymbol method, ConcurrentDictionary<INamedTypeSymbol, bool> knownTestAttributes, INamedTypeSymbol? benchmarkAttribute, INamedTypeSymbol? xunitFactAttribute)'. [/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.csproj] /datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/AbstractApplyTraitToClass`1.cs(83,41): error CS8602: Dereference of a possibly null reference. [/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.csproj] /datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/AbstractApplyTraitToClass`1.cs(103,51): error CS8602: Dereference of a possibly null reference. [/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/Core/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.csproj]

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-04-25T16:33:59Z

eng/Version.Details.xml

+    <Dependency Name="Microsoft.DotNet.XliffTasks" Version="1.0.0-beta.23211.1" CoherentParentDependency="Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk">
+      <Uri>https://github.com/dotnet/xliff-tasks</Uri>
+      <Sha>519d565b45c46ac452fe5a77ab63295138992e07</Sha>
+      <SourceBuild RepoName="xliff-tasks" ManagedOnly="true" />
    </Dependency>
    <Dependency Name="Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset" Version="4.5.0">


This package is marked as pre-built and we cannot utilize a ref assembly for it. Bumping the package to the latest version causes a built-time exception:

/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/Utilities/FlowAnalysis/FlowAnalysis/Analysis/TaintedDataAnalysis/TaintedDataAnalysis.TaintedDataOperationVisitor.cs(462,101): error CS8601: Possible null reference assignment. [/datadrive/source/roslyn-analyzers/artifacts/source-build/self/src/src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.csproj]

We'll need to fix the compile error. Because these 3 packages contain functionality that has to execute, them must either come from previously source-built, or from roslyn's build. Pinning to a stable version here works, but will probably mean more instability in product source build. Updating regularly from roslyn means more dependency flow and channel/subscription management.

I propose that we keep as-is for now, and if we see frequent breaks, we should move to change this to an actively updated dependency.

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-04-25T16:34:58Z

src/Directory.Build.targets

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
    </None>
  </ItemGroup>

-  <ItemGroup>
+  <ItemGroup Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'" >


We are not building Analyzers in source-build, hence this conditional

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-04-25T16:36:14Z

...ionAndConfigFilesForBrokenRuntime/GenerateDocumentationAndConfigFilesForBrokenRuntime.csproj

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@

  <ItemGroup>
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis" Version="$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisExecutableVersion)" />
-    <PackageReference Include="System.Collections.Immutable" Version="$(SystemCollectionsImmutableExecutableVersion)" />
-    <PackageReference Include="System.Reflection.Metadata" Version="$(SystemReflectionMetadataExecutableVersion)" />
+    <PackageReference Include="System.Composition" Version="8.0.0-preview.4.23220.1" />


Temporary change to make the build consume source-build-reference-package dependency until Microsoft.CodeAnalysis issue is resolved (described in #6606 (comment))

The package is loaded during the build and an SBRP for it exists. When a dependency on SBRP is added, the ref assembly for the package is picked up, crashing the build. I circumvented this by forcing the latest version of the package, which might not be desirable

codecov · 2023-04-25T17:03:54Z

Codecov Report

Merging #6610 (397fab4) into main (2b6ab8d) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6610      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.40%   96.40%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1379     1379              
  Lines      322253   322253              
  Branches    10460    10460              
==========================================
- Hits       310657   310654       -3     
- Misses       9103     9107       +4     
+ Partials     2493     2492       -1

oleksandr-didyk · 2023-05-02T09:06:18Z

@mavasani thank you for the approval, but unfortunately we would need some help from you and rolsyn-analyzers maintainers before this PR can be merged due to issues described here and here (as well as in the issue linked to the PR).

This might not have been conveyed properly initially, my bad. I converted the PR to Draft to better indicate its status

mmitche · 2023-05-10T21:46:38Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2023-05-10T21:46:43Z

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 6610 in repo dotnet/roslyn-analyzers

mmitche · 2023-05-23T21:34:40Z

Directory.Build.props

+  <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' == 'true'">
+    <!-- When building in source build mode, treat this set of warnings not as errors. Source build is
+         using a newer version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis than the default build -->
+    <NoWarn>$(NoWarn);CS8600;CS0618;CS8601;CS8602;CS8603;CS8604</NoWarn>


There are thousands of CA warnings when the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis is upgraded. These are set to nowarn in full source-build mode. Not sure whether it's worth taking a look at these.

mmitche · 2023-05-24T21:13:28Z

@sharwell can you take a look at this PR?

MichaelSimons · 2023-05-25T13:28:33Z

@mmitche - Can you please validate in the VMR prior to merging?

mmitche · 2023-05-25T13:52:49Z

@mmitche - Can you please validate in the VMR prior to merging?

Will do

mmitche · 2023-05-26T18:35:43Z

Local VMR build was green

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:08:35Z

src/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers/Core/MetaAnalyzers/Fixers/PreferIsKindFix.cs

@@ -48,7 +47,7 @@ private async Task<Document> ConvertKindToIsKindAsync(Document document, TextSpa

        protected abstract void FixDiagnostic(DocumentEditor editor, SyntaxNode nodeToFix);

-        private sealed class CustomFixAllProvider : DocumentBasedFixAllProvider
+        private sealed class CustomFixAllProvider : Analyzer.Utilities.DocumentBasedFixAllProvider


📝 Note to self: review this unexpected change

📝 It appears this library is building against the wrong set of reference assemblies. This should be corrected, at which point no changes are required to this file.

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:14:35Z

...deAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers/CSharp/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.BannedApiAnalyzers.csproj

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>2.9.0</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 2.9.0).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:15:07Z

...rosoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers.csproj

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
      Restore would conclude that there is a cyclic dependency between us and the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzer package.
    -->
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>2.9.0</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 2.9.0).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:15:22Z

....BannedApiAnalyzers/VisualBasic/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.BannedApiAnalyzers.vbproj

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>2.9.0</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 2.9.0).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:15:39Z

...Analysis.ResxSourceGenerator.CSharp/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ResxSourceGenerator.CSharp.csproj

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

    <!-- Avoid ID conflicts with the package project. -->
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>4.0.1</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForResxSourceGenerators)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 4.0.1).

I assume that goes for all the ResX projects?

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:15:46Z

...esxSourceGenerator.VisualBasic/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ResxSourceGenerator.VisualBasic.csproj

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

    <!-- Avoid ID conflicts with the package project. -->
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>4.0.1</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForResxSourceGenerators)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 4.0.1).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:15:53Z

...Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ResxSourceGenerator/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ResxSourceGenerator.csproj

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

    <!-- Avoid ID conflicts with the package project. -->
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>4.0.1</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForResxSourceGenerators)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 4.0.1).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:17:21Z

...nalyzers/CSharp/Analyzers/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.PerformanceSensitiveAnalyzers.csproj

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
-    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>2.9.0</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForPerfSensitiveAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 2.9.0).

sharwell · 2023-05-30T18:17:31Z

...Sharp/CodeFixes/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.PerformanceSensitiveAnalyzers.CodeFixes.csproj

    <ReleaseTrackingOptOut>true</ReleaseTrackingOptOut>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


📝 This project produces a library only. It should always build against a consistent set of reference assemblies (currently 2.9.0).

sharwell · 2023-05-31T20:11:56Z

...Sharp/CodeFixes/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.PerformanceSensitiveAnalyzers.CodeFixes.csproj

    <ReleaseTrackingOptOut>true</ReleaseTrackingOptOut>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


Suggested change

<MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>

<MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForPerfSensitiveAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>

sharwell · 2023-05-31T20:12:50Z

src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/CSharp/Roslyn.Diagnostics.CSharp.Analyzers.csproj

@@ -10,7 +11,7 @@
    <InternalsVisibleTo Include="Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.UnitTests" />
  </ItemGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
-    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces" Version="$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisForRoslynDiagnosticsAnalyzersVersion)" />
+    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces" Version="$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion)" />


❔ Did this need to change? It's not following the same pattern I see in other files.

This is following the same pattern as the rest of the files now (set property at the top PropertyGroup and use later)

sharwell · 2023-05-31T20:13:28Z

src/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers/UnitTests/Roslyn.Diagnostics.Analyzers.UnitTests.csproj

@@ -3,9 +3,10 @@
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>$(NetCurrent)</TargetFramework>
    <ServerGarbageCollection>true</ServerGarbageCollection>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForTests)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


❔ Are we expecting to build unit tests in source build? Are we expecting those tests to pass when executed? Is anything executing the tests currently?

None of the unit tests are executing in source build currently. Should build though.

- NoWarn a couple things - Update SBRPs

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:17:24Z

@sharwell Alright I made another significant iteration here. Goal was to ensure that product source build and repo source build always use the correct surface area when building the libraries here. Think I'm getting closer.

This repo tended to use MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion as a default and did not separate out when it was for surface area or executables. This presents a problem for source build, since it will just override that with the latest version coming from roslyn.

What I did was remove the global MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion property, and instead set it in each project that wants to use it, setting the value based on how it's used in the project. This means that source-build, which sets MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion globally, will not transparently reset the surface area for library projects. It also means that for non-source build, the version in use is much more obvious.

I still need to add one more reference package, but I think it's close now. PTAL.

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:18:28Z

NuGet.config

@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
  <packageSources>
    <clear />
    <add key="dotnet5" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet5/nuget/v3/index.json" />
+    <add key="general-testing" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/general-testing/nuget/v3/index.json" />


Ignore for now, will remove when the SBRP update is done.

Can this be removed now?

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:19:40Z

src/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.AnalyzerUtilities/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.AnalyzerUtilities.csproj

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@

    <!-- RS0026: Avoid public API overloads with differences in optional parameters -->
    <NoWarn>$(NoWarn);RS0026</NoWarn>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForCodeAnalysisAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:20:02Z

src/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers/CSharp/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzers.csproj

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForCodeAnalysisAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:20:07Z

src/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers/Core/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers.csproj

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
      Restore would conclude that there is a cyclic dependency between Microsoft.CodeAnalysis and Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers.
    -->
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForCodeAnalysisAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:20:22Z

...osoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers/VisualBasic/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Analyzers.vbproj

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForCodeAnalysisAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:21:33Z

src/NetAnalyzers/CSharp/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.NetAnalyzers.csproj

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForNetAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1. Added new property for this.

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:21:38Z

src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers.csproj

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
    <PackageId>*$(MSBuildProjectFile)*</PackageId>
    <RootNamespace></RootNamespace>
    <AllowUnsafeBlocks>true</AllowUnsafeBlocks>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForNetAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1. Added new property for this.

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:23:57Z

src/NetAnalyzers/VisualBasic/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.NetAnalyzers.vbproj

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForNetAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


No change in version, 3.3.1. Added new property for this.

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:25:22Z

...iveAnalyzers/UnitTests/Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PerformanceSensitiveAnalyzers.UnitTests.csproj

+
+    <!-- Executable code, so set this in non-source build or repo source-build. Full
+         source build will use the incoming, pre-set MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion. -->
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true' or '$(DotNetBuildFromSourceFlavor)' != 'Product'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForTests)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


@sharwell I want to verify that in these these unit test cases it is desired to build against the correct surface area (e.g. 2.9.0 for perf sensitive analyzers), but run against the test version (4.6.0*)

Looks like these fail when not executed against the 3.3.1 version. My bet is that the failures are just test issues (more diagnostics shown than expected). Reverting for now and marking these two as not building from source with an appropriate comment.

mmitche · 2023-06-02T20:27:30Z

src/Text.Analyzers/CSharp/Text.CSharp.Analyzers.csproj

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
+    <MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForTextAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>


Added new property for this, set to 3.3.1

…ools and utilities

mmitche · 2023-06-06T20:36:07Z

Woop Woop! All green and good to go. @dotnet/source-build-internal for SB signoff and @sharwell for any other comments on the PR.

MichaelSimons · 2023-06-07T13:15:17Z

NuGet.config

@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
  <packageSources>
    <clear />
    <add key="dotnet5" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/dotnet5/nuget/v3/index.json" />
+    <add key="general-testing" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/general-testing/nuget/v3/index.json" />


Can this be removed now?

MichaelSimons · 2023-06-07T13:16:24Z

eng/SourceBuildPrebuiltBaseline.xml

-    <UsagePattern IdentityGlob="*/*" />
+    <UsagePattern IdentityGlob="Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.*" />
+
+    <!-- This packages contain functionality that is executed in the build -->


Suggested change

MichaelSimons · 2023-06-07T13:17:09Z

eng/SourceBuildPrebuiltBaseline.xml

+         its dependencies. This is not an issue in full SB mode. -->
+    <UsagePattern IdentityGlob="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers*/*" />
+
+    <!-- This is the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis executed and built against in source build.


Can you clarify what source build you are referring to here? The repo leg or product build?

MichaelSimons · 2023-06-07T13:20:22Z

eng/SourceBuildPrebuiltBaseline.xml

+    <!-- This is the version of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis executed and built against in source build.
+         When updating that verison, update the version here. -->
+    <UsagePattern IdentityGlob="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis*/*4.6.0-1.final*" />
+    <UsagePattern IdentityGlob="System.Threading.Channels/*6.0.0*" />


Is this a transitive dependency from M.CA?

Turns out it's not needed. Removed.

mmitche · 2023-06-07T17:28:31Z

Addressed feedback.

mmitche · 2023-06-07T21:18:37Z

Running one last full VMR build to verify. I'll merge after unless @sharwell has additional comments

mmitche · 2023-06-08T18:35:45Z

Looking good.

oleksandr-didyk requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2023 16:31

github-actions bot added the Community label Apr 25, 2023

oleksandr-didyk commented Apr 25, 2023

View reviewed changes

mavasani approved these changes Apr 25, 2023

View reviewed changes

oleksandr-didyk commented Apr 25, 2023

View reviewed changes

oleksandr-didyk marked this pull request as draft May 2, 2023 09:01

mmitche force-pushed the add-pre-built-detection branch from 39ea5a2 to 56bec2d Compare May 23, 2023 21:24

mmitche marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2023 21:24

mmitche requested review from sharwell and a team May 23, 2023 21:24

mmitche reviewed May 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

sharwell reviewed May 30, 2023

View reviewed changes

arkalyanms approved these changes May 31, 2023

View reviewed changes

sharwell reviewed May 31, 2023

View reviewed changes

- Remove MicrosoftCodeAnalysis property

2292a1d

- NoWarn a couple things - Update SBRPs

mmitche reviewed Jun 2, 2023

View reviewed changes

mmitche added 4 commits June 6, 2023 08:41

Update to latest SBRPs

dd373c9

Update to latest humanizer and revert back to original versions for t…

622c6d1

…ools and utilities

Revert to old version for unit tests

30c6b2d

Add comment for issue number

b3de7f6

MichaelSimons reviewed Jun 7, 2023

View reviewed changes

Trim prebuilts and respond to feedback

397fab4

MichaelSimons approved these changes Jun 7, 2023

View reviewed changes

mmitche merged commit 127dd35 into dotnet:main Jun 8, 2023
11 checks passed

github-actions bot added this to the vNext milestone Jun 8, 2023

mavasani mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2023

Bump up the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis version used by packages in the repo #6701

Merged

		<ReleaseTrackingOptOut>true</ReleaseTrackingOptOut>
		<MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion Condition="'$(DotNetBuildFromSource)' != 'true'">$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>

		<ReleaseTrackingOptOut>true</ReleaseTrackingOptOut>
		<MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>$(MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersionForBannedApiAnalyzers)</MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion>

	<!-- This packages contain functionality that is executed in the build -->
	<!-- These packages contain functionality that is executed in the build -->

enable pre-built detection #6610

enable pre-built detection #6610

Conversation

oleksandr-didyk commented Apr 25, 2023 • edited

oleksandr-didyk Apr 25, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

oleksandr-didyk Apr 25, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2023 • edited

Codecov Report

oleksandr-didyk commented May 2, 2023

mmitche commented May 10, 2023

azure-pipelines bot commented May 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mmitche commented May 24, 2023

MichaelSimons commented May 25, 2023

mmitche commented May 25, 2023

mmitche commented May 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

sharwell May 30, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

sharwell May 30, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

sharwell May 30, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

sharwell May 30, 2023 • edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mmitche commented Jun 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mmitche commented Jun 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mmitche commented Jun 7, 2023

mmitche commented Jun 7, 2023

mmitche commented Jun 8, 2023

oleksandr-didyk commented Apr 25, 2023 •

edited

oleksandr-didyk Apr 25, 2023 •

edited

oleksandr-didyk Apr 25, 2023 •

edited

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2023 •

edited

sharwell May 30, 2023 •

edited

sharwell May 30, 2023 •

edited

sharwell May 30, 2023 •

edited

sharwell May 30, 2023 •

edited