Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of performance regressions caused by switching to ICU #40942

Open
adamsitnik opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 69 comments
Open

List of performance regressions caused by switching to ICU #40942

adamsitnik opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 69 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member

adamsitnik commented Aug 17, 2020

Before 5.0, we were using ICU only on Unix systems. In 5.0 we have decided to use it on Windows by default as well.

This is something that we have done in order to have the same behavior of string-related globalization APIs on every OS.

However, this particular change has affected the performance characteristics of many frequently used methods. Some of them have regressed, some have improved.

Recently we have reported a lot of 5.0 regressions related to that. Since we have done this on purpose and we are most probably not going to revert the switch, I am opening this issue to track the list of all known regressions. When the list becomes complete, we are most probably going to update the 5.0 release docs and close the issue and label it as wont fix.

Please feel free to edit the list.

Known changes:

cc @danmosemsft @tarekgh @billwert @DrewScoggins @GrabYourPitchforks @jkotas @safern

@adamsitnik adamsitnik added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Aug 17, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 17, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tarekgh, @safern, @krwq
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Aug 17, 2020
@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString 5 regressions, 5 improvements

Method input value comparisonType 3.1 Mean 5.0 ICU 5.0 NLS
IndexOfString AAAAA5AAAA 5 InvariantCulture 79.07 ns 35.41 ns 72.05 ns
IndexOfString AAAAAAAAAAAA(...)AAAAAAAAAAAA [1000] X Ordinal 39.72 ns 38.89 ns 38.25 ns
IndexOfString AAAAAAAAAAAA(...)AAAAAAAAAAAA [100] x InvariantCultureIgnoreCase 300.45 ns 214.39 ns 294.59 ns
IndexOfString AAAAAAAAAAAA(...)AAAAAAAAAAAA [100] x OrdinalIgnoreCase 245.94 ns 802.33 ns 240.42 ns
IndexOfString ABCDE c InvariantCultureIgnoreCase 71.81 ns 30.26 ns 63.83 ns
IndexOfString Hello Worldb(...)allylong!xyz [186] w OrdinalIgnoreCase 45.80 ns 102.63 ns 40.30 ns
IndexOfString Hello Worldb(...)allylong!xyz [187] ~ Ordinal 28.52 ns 22.28 ns 21.03 ns
IndexOfString Hello Worldbb(...)bbbbbbbbbbba! [47] y Ordinal 24.15 ns 14.09 ns 13.57 ns
IndexOfString More Test's Tests OrdinalIgnoreCase 56.38 ns 108.93 ns 50.48 ns
IndexOfString StrIng string OrdinalIgnoreCase 38.79 ns 55.01 ns 33.86 ns
IndexOfString foobardzsdzs rddzs InvariantCulture 101.46 ns 44.93 ns 94.90 ns
IndexOfString string1 string2 InvariantCulture 91.45 ns 37.14 ns 80.95 ns
IndexOfString ? ? InvariantCulture 108.70 ns 4,069.11 ns 105.36 ns
IndexOfString ????????????(...)???????????? [100] ? Ordinal 25.08 ns 16.88 ns 15.48 ns
IndexOfString ????????????(...)???????????? [1000] x Ordinal 39.70 ns 39.19 ns 37.99 ns

Comment: InvariantCulture and InvariantCultureIgnoreCase have improved, while OrdinalIgnoreCase has regressed. We could implement OrdinalIgnoreCase path in managed code if it ever becomes a problem

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

Thank you @adamsitnik good idea I'm glad you created this.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Aug 17, 2020

I have this PR opened for addressing all ordinal operations #40910

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Aug 17, 2020

@adamsitnik are you going to close all other bugs complaining about ICU perf against this one?

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

adamsitnik commented Aug 17, 2020

are you going to close all other bugs complaining about ICU perf against this one?

That's my plan. I will try to do my best to do it for as many as I can.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Aug 17, 2020

Also, I want to be clear about the expectation here. I don't think we can fix all perf here as we are limited by calling ICU. we can look at how we can improve it but I am not expecting to get the perf to the point where we used to call NLS. So, it will be good to decide which items in this list is a blocker. The only one was the Ordinal cases which I am addressing in the attached PR. I am not aware of any other blocking scenario. We'll look more of course on other scenarios anyway but I am not sure how much we can do before 5.0 release.

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash 2 regressions, 4 improvements

Method Count Options 3.1 Mean 5.0 ICU Mean 5.0 NLS Mean
GetHashCode 128 (, IgnoreCase) 1,806.07 ns 1,806.0 ns 1,806.10 ns
GetHashCode 128 (, None) 1,823.38 ns 2,284.0 ns 1,818.16 ns
GetHashCode 128 (en-US, IgnoreCase) 1,831.84 ns 1,816.0 ns 1,790.90 ns
GetHashCode 128 (en-US, None) 1,820.91 ns 2,296.8 ns 1,815.97 ns
GetHashCode 128 (en-US, Ordinal) 99.33 ns 100.0 ns 99.61 ns
GetHashCode 128 (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase) 123.93 ns 122.6 ns 121.49 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (, IgnoreCase) 2,207,798.50 ns 1,773,953.8 ns 2,193,202.55 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (, None) 2,209,727.34 ns 1,893,550.0 ns 2,187,722.71 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (en-US, IgnoreCase) 2,196,075.39 ns 1,781,730.1 ns 2,190,508.15 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (en-US, None) 2,214,228.87 ns 1,899,934.3 ns 2,185,224.74 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (en-US, Ordinal) 96,294.65 ns 96,513.7 ns 96,551.91 ns
GetHashCode 131072 (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase) 113,393.49 ns 112,940.4 ns 116,436.80 ns

Comment: there are two regressions for Count=128 but four improvements for Count=131072

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality: 8 regressions, 14 improvements

Method Count Options 3.1 Mean 5.0 ICU Mean 5.0 NLS Mean
Compare_Same 1024 (, IgnoreCase) 996.299 ns 575.414 ns 997.39 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (, IgnoreCase) 3,373.889 ns 6,798.371 ns 3,356.57 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (, IgnoreCase) 43.730 ns 37.378 ns 42.73 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (, None) 1,003.408 ns 572.528 ns 1,003.25 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (, None) 4,123.875 ns 6,747.893 ns 4,033.30 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (, None) 41.883 ns 34.904 ns 43.04 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, IgnoreCase) 992.625 ns 564.239 ns 1,012.86 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, IgnoreCase) 3,334.161 ns 6,789.031 ns 3,336.49 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, IgnoreCase) 41.821 ns 36.251 ns 41.92 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace) 1,667.106 ns 564.521 ns 1,671.78 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace) 9,547.973 ns 2,103.148 ns 9,599.69 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace) 66.929 ns 35.786 ns 59.21 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, IgnoreSymbols) 1,676.295 ns 569.468 ns 1,679.39 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, IgnoreSymbols) 9,100.891 ns 11,605.391 ns 9,075.81 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, IgnoreSymbols) 8,219.648 ns 21,916.551 ns 8,311.14 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, None) 988.500 ns 572.970 ns 1,005.15 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, None) 4,040.998 ns 6,740.818 ns 4,007.38 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, None) 41.931 ns 35.349 ns 42.87 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, Ordinal) 82.818 ns 67.527 ns 68.47 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, Ordinal) 13.907 ns 14.796 ns 14.82 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, Ordinal) 5.432 ns 9.946 ns 10.27 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase) 815.592 ns 822.866 ns 834.45 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase) 1,225.463 ns 1,218.922 ns 1,253.77 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase) 10.517 ns 11.977 ns 11.30 ns
Compare_Same 1024 (pl-PL, None) 21,378.839 ns 572.036 ns 21,617.36 ns
Compare_Same_Upper 1024 (pl-PL, None) 22,136.295 ns 17,518.080 ns 22,375.84 ns
Compare_DifferentFirstChar 1024 (pl-PL, None) 61.794 ns 37.698 ns 62.93 ns

Comment: ICU seems to be faster when inputs are the same or the first character is different but slows down when we are comparing lowercase and uppercase versions of the same words

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch: 30 regressions, 32 improvements

Method Options 3.1 Mean 5.0 ICU Mean 5.0 NLS Mean
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (, IgnoreCase, False) 279.556 ns 204.122 ns 270.881 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (, IgnoreCase, False) 58.887 ns 18.055 ns 53.431 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (, IgnoreCase, False) 264.358 ns 191.353 ns 262.566 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (, IgnoreCase, False) 61.441 ns 18.846 ns 56.044 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (, IgnoreCase, False) 802.657 ns 628.962 ns 798.926 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (, IgnoreCase, False) 975.995 ns 620.031 ns 965.195 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (, IgnoreCase, True) 1,012.810 ns 3,677.834 ns 1,019.808 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (, IgnoreCase, True) 72.985 ns 853.547 ns 72.039 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (, IgnoreCase, True) 2,552.799 ns 7,467.664 ns 2,575.991 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (, IgnoreCase, True) 5,376.895 ns 1,288.707 ns 5,329.497 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (, IgnoreCase, True) 3,931.968 ns 11,275.663 ns 3,831.631 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (, IgnoreCase, True) 3,142.703 ns 17,463.707 ns 3,042.517 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (, None, False) 211.472 ns 173.105 ns 201.325 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (, None, False) 56.298 ns 17.402 ns 53.396 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (, None, False) 182.540 ns 174.536 ns 179.486 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (, None, False) 58.275 ns 18.166 ns 55.200 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (, None, False) 699.751 ns 500.508 ns 678.148 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (, None, False) 850.232 ns 502.581 ns 845.351 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (, None, True) 1,052.320 ns 3,636.952 ns 1,021.712 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (, None, True) 73.568 ns 848.922 ns 72.912 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (, None, True) 2,595.612 ns 7,554.091 ns 2,540.565 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (, None, True) 5,306.733 ns 1,317.628 ns 5,348.958 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (, None, True) 3,935.667 ns 11,177.835 ns 3,803.958 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (, None, True) 3,083.463 ns 16,993.198 ns 3,029.761 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 270.134 ns 205.387 ns 273.552 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 57.763 ns 18.110 ns 54.154 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 258.893 ns 190.355 ns 260.361 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 58.943 ns 19.272 ns 56.319 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 807.236 ns 622.869 ns 798.647 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreCase, False) 975.083 ns 623.089 ns 955.210 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 1,018.976 ns 3,666.344 ns 1,026.411 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 76.465 ns 887.811 ns 72.117 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 2,563.798 ns 7,529.526 ns 2,565.718 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 5,305.949 ns 1,304.493 ns 5,346.831 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 3,892.140 ns 11,776.383 ns 3,926.784 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreCase, True) 3,090.867 ns 17,430.155 ns 3,072.910 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 1,020.808 ns 178.017 ns 1,017.612 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 67.336 ns 18.067 ns 65.861 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 2,552.693 ns 178.425 ns 2,544.768 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 4,921.510 ns 18.199 ns 4,858.353 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 3,906.457 ns 506.498 ns 3,792.084 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreNonSpace, False) 3,076.625 ns 507.002 ns 3,048.544 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 1,022.075 ns 16,888.924 ns 1,020.346 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 70.421 ns 29,267.090 ns 66.428 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 3,437.616 ns 19,397.341 ns 3,411.783 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 5,308.903 ns 34,515.843 ns 5,333.271 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 3,310.485 ns 11,414.777 ns 3,285.185 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False) 3,468.180 ns 16,640.286 ns 3,393.434 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, None, False) 205.249 ns 176.915 ns 200.000 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, None, False) 59.057 ns 17.779 ns 53.980 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, None, False) 184.039 ns 177.072 ns 181.258 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, None, False) 59.873 ns 18.232 ns 55.897 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, None, False) 688.002 ns 504.985 ns 681.283 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, None, False) 841.277 ns 506.640 ns 859.611 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, None, True) 1,026.332 ns 3,676.392 ns 1,129.406 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, None, True) 72.958 ns 860.499 ns 73.269 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, None, True) 2,555.954 ns 7,625.414 ns 2,556.183 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, None, True) 5,320.978 ns 1,349.628 ns 5,373.210 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, None, True) 3,783.346 ns 11,472.314 ns 3,884.931 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, None, True) 3,080.818 ns 17,512.610 ns 3,077.301 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, Ordinal, False) 12.480 ns 14.469 ns 12.584 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, Ordinal, False) 6.229 ns 8.496 ns 8.925 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, Ordinal, False) 14.058 ns 12.034 ns 14.248 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, Ordinal, False) 19.645 ns 17.446 ns 16.225 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, Ordinal, False) 39.451 ns 37.728 ns 39.207 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, Ordinal, False) 137.367 ns 97.667 ns 98.362 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 73.307 ns 82.618 ns 83.575 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 9.844 ns 9.585 ns 9.731 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 109.128 ns 83.181 ns 80.728 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 203.785 ns 149.656 ns 141.373 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 701.811 ns 3,125.640 ns 705.609 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (en-US, OrdinalIgnoreCase, False) 617.823 ns 3,161.417 ns 621.380 ns
IsPrefix_FirstHalf (pl-PL, None, False) 2,594.625 ns 5,704.863 ns 2,558.898 ns
IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar (pl-PL, None, False) 101.082 ns 857.463 ns 98.650 ns
IsSuffix_SecondHalf (pl-PL, None, False) 8,633.560 ns 8,435.046 ns 8,586.963 ns
IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar (pl-PL, None, False) 19,423.848 ns 1,216.271 ns 17,376.208 ns
IndexOf_Word_NotFound (pl-PL, None, False) 9,534.684 ns 14,329.673 ns 9,455.980 ns
LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound (pl-PL, None, False) 8,689.332 ns 18,014.702 ns 8,657.101 ns

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

System.Globalization.Tests.Perf_DateTimeCultureInfo.Parse: 1 big regression for ja culture, 5 improvements

Method culturestring 3.1 Mean 5.0 ICU 5.0 NLS
ToStringHebrewIsrael ? 540.1 ns 463.3 ns 518.3 ns
ToString 254.0 ns 248.9 ns 245.7 ns
Parse 466.9 ns 423.7 ns 424.7 ns
ToString da 247.5 ns 234.0 ns 241.1 ns
Parse da 551.2 ns 449.3 ns 515.6 ns
ToString fr 251.5 ns 246.4 ns 244.3 ns
Parse fr 466.5 ns 424.7 ns 440.2 ns
ToString ja 258.1 ns 243.5 ns 245.4 ns
Parse ja 482.1 ns 5,078.9 ns 456.9 ns

Comment: this is a known ICU issue: #31273

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

are you going to close all other bugs complaining about ICU perf against this one?

@tarekgh I've gone through all System.Memory and System.Globalization issues with performance tag and updated the list. It should be complete now.

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

@Symbai I see you've thumbs-down. Could you share your concerns?

@Symbai
Copy link

Symbai commented Aug 19, 2020

@danmosemsft Its not about adamsitnik work of collecting the regressions which I find very helpful. Its about the fact that switching to ICU has introduced MAJOR regressions (+4,500ns, ~ 4x slower) while the "improvements" are usually around ~2ns which I bet is only some noise and running them a couple of times will show there are no improvements at all.

I'm not into ICU and I dont know why this change was made at all but seeing all the performance improvements in .NET Core the last versions and now such a big regression on hot code path that is literally being used anywhere, makes me really wonder what in god's name can be that much useful about ICU that it worth THIS regression. I've thumbs-down because I disagree on this ICU change and I disagree on statements which say that "we might not fix some of these regressions". Especially without telling people that switching to .NET 5 will make their code much more slower without a benefit (there might be a benefit in ICU, but I bet it won't affect most people... unlike this performance regression).

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Aug 19, 2020

@Symbai you have the option to switch back to use NLS if you want to.

ICU is the future direction in general for the .NET and Windows too. ICU will give the opportunity to have a consistency between OS's and OS versions. The benefit of using ICU is really worth it. ICU will give opportunity to the apps to customize the globalization behavior too.

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

Also note that this is already what is used on Linux and Mac, and increasingly used within Windows OS itself. So we are aligning with the industry here. If and where it is slow - we all benefit from making it faster. The .NET team have contributed bug reports and performance improvements to libicu in the past, and I expect we will do so again.

@krwq
Copy link
Member

krwq commented Aug 20, 2020

As a side note, ICU is open source and we can contribute to make hot paths faster

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Nov 9, 2020

For who don't know what is PGO, it is Profile-guided optimization.

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

danmoseley commented Nov 9, 2020

also cc @lewing (although I guess his focus is just size)

@iSazonov
Copy link
Contributor

iSazonov commented Nov 14, 2020

For information only. PowerShell 7.1 was released on .Net 5.0 and we already got performance feedback PowerShell/PowerShell#14087

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Nov 15, 2020

@iSazonov did you have chance to investigate more and know where is the regression is coming from?

Also, could you please measure the same scenario on .NET 6.0? we have some more optimization there it may help?

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Nov 15, 2020

@danmosemsft we care about performance a lot too, we just had disproportionately large (small?) size needs here. @tarekgh great work on all this.

PGO of the unmanaged code looks complicated in our case because we'd need a way for our compiler/toolchain to consume the the profile.

@iSazonov
Copy link
Contributor

@iSazonov did you have chance to investigate more and know where is the regression is coming from?

@tarekgh I believe it is an expected regression after moving to ICU. I shared the feedback to demonstrate what users can see in real scenarios.

Also, could you please measure the same scenario on .NET 6.0? we have some more optimization there it may help?

PowerShell repository is still on .Net 5.0. I guess PowerShell MSFT team will move to .Net 6.0 after .Net 6 Preview1 will be available to them. Then we could compare.

If users see such a noticeable regression, I would expect your latest improvements to be ported to .Net 5.0.

As for PGO, I think this could be a good step towards reaping benefits quickly with minimal cost. I assume you already have these statistics from MSFT services. But in general it is obvious which functions are the most used.

More important is how this performance is achieved. I see that there is a desire to make Runtime more compact. This is important for scenarios like WASM. But in other cases, this is not critical. If hardware intrinsics use double and triple implementations, why not do the same for strings? - a compact but slower implementation for WASM and etc. and a faster but more capacious implementation for other scenarios - it is not problem for PowerShell script execution to have additional 10 buffers by 20 Kb or even by 1 Mb.
I can speculate that no one will understand why the Binq service is 20% slower just for the sake of WASM running in the browser. Based on the same test set WASM could be get more compact runtime by means of conditional compiling to use only compact implementations.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Nov 16, 2020

I believe it is an expected regression after moving to ICU. I shared the feedback to demonstrate what users can see in real scenarios.

@iSazonov I am still unclear what exactly regressed in the user scenario? did you investigate PowerShell and looked where the regression is happening? what calls to .NET is regressed?

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

the referenced issue (PowerShell/PowerShell#14087) mentions:

(...) on many lines of text to remove lines matching a criteria in a 85MB text file

So it could be string.IndexOf, string.Contains, string.Remove, string.Replace or even RegEx. Let's wait for the user to provide more details

A script of mine that reliably took 26 or 27 minutes to run in 7.0 now takes 40 minutes in 7.1.

It should take less than a minute to handle 85 MB text file. We might be able to provide some recommendations as well.

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

I've looked into the PowerShell trace files and it looks like the regression is not related to ICU, but Regex.Replace (cc @stephentoub). For more details please see PowerShell/PowerShell#14087 (comment)

We should expect a new issue to be created soon by PowerShell contributors (PowerShell/PowerShell#14087 (comment))

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Nov 19, 2020

To tell, @jefgen thankfully is in doing some optimization work from the ICU side

unicode-org/icu#1471
unicode-org/icu#1473

You can see the perf numbers in the ticket https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-21388

@adamsitnik
Copy link
Member Author

@jefgen very nice improvements! did Windows Team consider using PGO (Profile Guided Optimization) to improve ICU perf?

@jefgen
Copy link

jefgen commented Nov 20, 2020

@jefgen very nice improvements!

Thanks!
FWIW, I had a few more ideas that might help to improve the performance more, but I haven't had time to investigate them as of yet.

did Windows Team consider using PGO (Profile Guided Optimization) to improve ICU perf?

Yes the version of ICU that ships as part of the OS with Windows (icu.dll) is indeed using PGO. However, IIUC, I think that the "training data" used for it is from scenarios for the old/legacy Edge browser. I wonder if it might be possible to somehow use training data from .NET Core instead? (I'm not sure if that is possible though, and/or how it might work).

That said, the pre-built Windows binary downloads for the public ICU don't use PGO though.
The Nuget package that our team produces for ICU (with data changes for Microsoft products) also doesn't currently use PGO either. (Both of these would/could be used for the .NET app-local ICU feature).

TBH, I'm not super familiar with PGO though, so I wonder if it might be good to sync up to discuss more sometime perhaps?.

@iSazonov
Copy link
Contributor

iSazonov commented Nov 29, 2020

I measured PowerShell startup scenario. Command line is pwsh -c exit. PowerShell processes args[] and for the command line it calls once string.ToLowerInvariant() for args[0] that is "c". This takes 26 ms. I guess it is slow ICU initialization.
SpeedScope file:
PerfViewData-7.2-Startup-AI-DT.speedscope.json.zip
image

Update: I found another slow ICU initialization in the scenario - we mistakenly called string.StartsWith() with a default StringComparison.CurrentCulture - it calls slow icu!ucol_openElements. I replaced with with Ordinal but
the fact remains - ICU is initialized too slow for PowerSHell startup scenario.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Jan 10, 2021

To update the current status I have done the latest measurement comparing the 3.1 (the Base) against 6.0 (the diff).

Usually I experience some instability in the results of IsPrefix and IsSuffix on my machine so maybe the numbers of these tests are not accurate.

Considering 6.0 faster in some scenarios and slower in other scenarios, we may need to look more at the slower scenarios. But in general, I think we are in much better state even we can do more.

Slower diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 355.35 63.98 22735.21
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, 11.89 60.06 714.32
System.Globalization.Tests.Perf_DateTimeCultureInfo.Parse(culturestring: ja) 11.81 435.96 5150.00
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, 11.59 59.34 687.94
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 10.59 71.06 752.27
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, Igno 9.79 1230.14 12044.71
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 9.58 71.05 680.59
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "?", value: "?", comparisonType: 9.35 89.84 839.52
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (pl 6.92 97.22 672.96
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 4.77 6048.56 28822.60
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 3.97 3387.45 13432.09
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ign 3.85 3875.09 14903.18
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, Ig 3.80 3425.80 13008.36
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 3.79 3406.47 12902.87
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, No 3.79 3375.25 12779.77
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (, IgnoreCas 3.26 1225.06 3989.05
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 3.25 3735.02 12154.61
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (, None, Tru 3.20 1231.01 3936.81
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, Igno 3.20 1249.21 3991.98
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, None 3.17 1246.25 3944.60
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (, IgnoreCa 2.19 2962.57 6493.42
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (, None, Tr 2.18 2985.69 6514.83
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Non 2.17 2994.42 6483.37
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ign 2.16 3016.11 6524.22
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 2.06 9793.37 20199.81
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 2.01 5.04 10.12
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (pl-PL, None 1.93 2702.20 5217.48
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.74 3055.79 5309.93
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.72 3064.04 5259.70
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (pl-P 1.67 8432.65 14106.59 several?
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, I 1.63 3512.51 5714.36
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (, None, Fal 1.43 143.80 205.91
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.42 3804.85 5415.19
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (, None, Fa 1.41 183.05 257.96
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.39 3860.38 5362.28
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, None 1.38 150.76 207.55
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 1.36 6.29 8.53
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, I 1.35 4352.17 5872.62 several?
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, Ignore 1.33 4349.01 5804.45
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Non 1.33 192.87 256.04
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, N 1.31 4342.61 5683.86
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, None, 1.30 4424.18 5730.22
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.18 12.26 14.51
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 128, Options: (, None)) 1.18 1592.80 1882.03
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 128, Options: (en-US, N 1.15 1637.91 1881.80
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 1.11 8.05 8.98
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (, IgnoreCa 1.08 214.00 231.22
Faster base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 327.82 5636.99 17.20
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (pl 21.58 21715.82 1006.19
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (pl- 17.60 17759.59 1009.28
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ign 11.52 2976.54 258.40
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, I 9.97 4352.38 436.54
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 7.90 3339.68 422.59
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, Igno 5.94 1227.92 206.88
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (, N 5.76 6038.00 1048.36
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 5.70 6012.40 1055.24
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (, I 5.66 6028.64 1065.38
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 5.31 6000.28 1130.70
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 3.97 10432.14 2630.57
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 3.97 64.39 16.24
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 3.88 64.89 16.73
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 3.27 53.30 16.32
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 3.18 51.48 16.19
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en 3.10 51.88 16.72
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (, N 2.59 43.52 16.79
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, 2.59 41.51 16.04
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (, I 2.58 43.56 16.89
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, 2.57 43.39 16.87
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "string1", value: "string2", com 2.48 76.93 30.99
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 2.38 108.67 45.67
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "foobardzsdzs", value: "rddzs", 2.32 86.74 37.46
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 2.18 78.59 36.06
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "AAAAA5AAAA", value: "5", compar 2.11 63.04 29.82
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "ABCDE", value: "c", comparisonT 2.07 53.78 25.93
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 2.07 878.20 423.61
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, No 2.07 873.42 422.79
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 2.01 1082.01 539.23
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, Ig 2.00 1090.20 544.92
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "StrIng", value: "string", compa 1.98 43.01 21.69
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, None, 1.81 771.12 426.00
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, N 1.79 770.64 431.25
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, Igno 1.77 274.01 155.07
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "More Test's", value: "Tests", c 1.75 56.81 32.51
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 1.74 62.12 35.63
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "??????????????????????????????? 1.71 23.46 13.70
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (, IgnoreCas 1.68 263.07 156.53
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 1.65 1234.22 747.17
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, O 1.65 827.37 501.93
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "Hello Worldbbbbbbbbbbbbbbcbbbbb 1.61 21.75 13.49
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 1.60 884.82 553.21
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1.56 280.66 179.49
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "Hello Worldbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb 1.54 42.92 27.95
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 131072, Options: (, Ign 1.52 2208814.73 1456858.52
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 1.51 173.44 114.64
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ord 1.51 91.77 60.81
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 131072, Options: (en-US 1.50 2185948.21 1458638.64
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "Hello Worldbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb 1.45 26.75 18.43
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (, Ignore 1.42 768.69 541.95
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 131072, Options: (en-US 1.39 2175261.61 1562373.13
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.39 22249.54 16009.44
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 131072, Options: (, Non 1.38 2154764.29 1563706.25
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 1.34 1344.50 1004.85
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1.33 38.36 28.86
System.Globalization.Tests.Perf_DateTimeCultureInfo.Parse(culturestring: da) 1.32 507.79 385.35
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1.31 233.70 178.34
System.Memory.ReadOnlySpan.IndexOfString(input: "??????????????????????????????? 1.31 37.81 28.91
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 1.31 1325.58 1014.02
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (, 1.30 1299.60 1003.48
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 1.29 1301.69 1010.57
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 1.28 45.46 35.50
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, I 1.28 769.79 601.59
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (en 1.27 1285.98 1011.62
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same(Count: 1024, Options: (, 1.25 1261.57 1009.91
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_DifferentFirstChar(Count: 1024 1.24 43.21 34.91
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-US, O 1.23 38.85 31.67 several?
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.LastIndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (en-U 1.22 129.74 106.45
System.Globalization.Tests.Perf_DateTimeCultureInfo.Parse(culturestring: fr) 1.21 437.41 360.07
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IndexOf_Word_NotFound(Options: (pl-PL, N 1.19 9184.99 7697.78
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ign 1.18 272.30 230.99
System.Globalization.Tests.Perf_DateTimeCultureInfo.Parse(culturestring: ) 1.17 425.10 363.77
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 128, Options: (en-US, I 1.13 1665.63 1470.75
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (pl-PL, Non 1.13 8582.96 7609.07
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 128, Options: (, Ignore 1.10 1652.53 1503.49
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_DifferentLastChar(Options: (en- 1.09 17.00 15.56
System.Globalization.Tests.StringEquality.Compare_Same_Upper(Count: 1024, Option 1.08 10493.72 9745.46
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsSuffix_SecondHalf(Options: (en-US, Ord 1.07 13.45 12.63
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_FirstHalf(Options: (en-US, Ordi 1.06 11.74 11.10 several?
System.Globalization.Tests.StringHash.GetHashCode(Count: 128, Options: (en-US, O 1.04 101.90 97.68

@L2
Copy link
Contributor

L2 commented Feb 2, 2022

@adamsitnik @tarekgh Friendly ping to see if there's any progress with resolving these ICU related regressions, since it's now the default library.

Seeing this on my end, for example:

Slower diff/base NLS - Base Median (ns) ICU - Diff Median (ns) Modality
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en-US, IgnoreSymbols, False)) 407.94 54.02 22036.56
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en-US, IgnoreCase, True)) 12.13 57.79 700.76
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, IgnoreCase, True)) 11.94 57.98 691.99
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (en-US, None, True)) 11.79 57.83 681.78
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (, None, True)) 11.68 58.88 688.01
System.Globalization.Tests.StringSearch.IsPrefix_DifferentFirstChar(Options: (pl-PL, None, False)) 8.70 79.92 695.66

Thanks

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Feb 2, 2022

@L2 We are not actively looking at this at the current time for other high-priority work. Using options like IgnoreSymbols is expected to have more cost because it is done with the slow path. Could you please talk more about your scenario to try to see if there is any workaround for now?

@L2
Copy link
Contributor

L2 commented Feb 15, 2022

Thanks, @tarekgh . It was mainly due to the difference seen for these benchmarks when comparing the previous NLS library to the now default ICU library. I've tried setting DOTNET_SYSTEM_GLOBALIZATION_USENLS and can confirm this gives back the original perf.

Currently on my system (win10 x64 with latest updates), the icu.dll located in Windows/System32 reports being version 64.2. Looking over at the ICU github repo, this release is from Apr 17, 2019 (https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases?page=3) and I think built with an older MSVC2017 (https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/blob/release-64-2/icu4c/readme.html).

Do you know if there's any plans to roll out an updated icu.dll via windows updates anytime soon?

Thanks

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Feb 15, 2022

I think Windows 10 should have a higher version of ICU than what you have listed.

@jefgen could you please comment on @L2 question #40942 (comment)?

@jefgen
Copy link

jefgen commented Feb 15, 2022

The story is unfortunately a bit complicated...
The version of ICU that is part of the Windows OneCore base was updated to a newer version, version 68.2. However, Windows 10 is still based on the older OneCore release, so this means that Windows 10 didn't get the updated version of ICU. The Windows 11 release was built on the newer OneCore bits, so it got the updated version of ICU.
(You can see that the Windows 10 build number is still ~1904x, so the last few releases are all based on the same underlying OneCore bits).

What this means is that Windows 10 is still on ICU version 64.2, while Windows 11 is on ICU version 68.2.

roll out an updated icu.dll via windows updates anytime soon?

I don't think there are currently any plans to push an updated version of ICU via Windows update at this time.

built with an older MSVC2017

AFAIK, the OS binaries aren't built using the public compiler. However, I'm not sure off-hand what exact version of the cl.exe compiler is used though.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Feb 15, 2022

Thanks @jefgen for the details.

@L2 you still have the option to use the ICU app-local feature to use the latest ICU version if you want.

  <ItemGroup>
        <RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.Globalization.AppLocalIcu" Value="68.2.0.6" />
        <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.ICU.ICU4C.Runtime" Version="68.2.0.6" />
  </ItemGroup>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests