Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: inconsistent use of "Archived" status/state between Issue Library and Rules Engine #896

Closed
mavensecurity opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@mavensecurity
Copy link

Steps to reproduce

Marking an entry in Rules Engine with a Status of "Archived" will prevent it from being applied - which is expected.
Marking an entry in the Issue Library with a State of "Archived" does not prevent it from being applied by Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".

Expected behavior

Having a quick way to archive Issue Library entries (withing editing each #[_id]# entry) would be useful, and seems to be the best interpretation of having an Issue with a State marked "Archived".

Actual behavior

"Archived" Issue Library entry are still applied by the Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".

System configuration

Dradis version: 3.12.2

Ruby version: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-linux]

OS version: Debian 4.9.110

@rachkor
Copy link
Member

rachkor commented Sep 14, 2021

Thank you @mavensecurity! I'm going to go ahead and close this as this is a Pro feature and we track those in an internal idea backlog. I've already added it there! The feedback is definitely appreciated.

@rachkor rachkor closed this as completed Sep 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants