You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm currently implementing this on a site and several users found that they can enter their password without the @ sign. I pass the email in the input fields argument. I'm not sure if this needs a stronger check, for instance a user might use a combination of their name and company for the password. So perhaps any instance of another field found anywhere in the password should reduce the strength, and a match of the password without the @ sign fail?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
the second argument to zxcvbn(), user_inputs, can be any list of tokens you like. So you could add all of these yourself to get the behavior you're looking for:
the second argument to zxcvbn(), user_inputs, can be any list of
tokens you like. So you could add all of these yourself to get the
behavior you're looking for:
I'm currently implementing this on a site and several users found that they can enter their password without the @ sign. I pass the email in the input fields argument. I'm not sure if this needs a stronger check, for instance a user might use a combination of their name and company for the password. So perhaps any instance of another field found anywhere in the password should reduce the strength, and a match of the password without the @ sign fail?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: