Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch back to outcome_date #84

Closed
thcrock opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Switch back to outcome_date #84

thcrock opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@thcrock
Copy link
Contributor

thcrock commented Mar 31, 2017

When generating labels, we currently look for a 'date' column but this is wrong. Use outcome_date, to match the yaml comments

@thcrock thcrock added the bug label Mar 31, 2017
@thcrock thcrock self-assigned this Mar 31, 2017
@thcrock thcrock added this to the v0.3 milestone Apr 5, 2017
@k1aus k1aus closed this as completed in 85b2fe5 Apr 6, 2017
k1aus added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2017
Have BinaryLabelGenerator look for outcome_date [Resolves #84]
jesteria pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2017
Don't modify dict during iteration when shortening keys
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant