Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NWChem "driver" arguments within autodE #260

Open
eneas77 opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

NWChem "driver" arguments within autodE #260

eneas77 opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@eneas77
Copy link

eneas77 commented Mar 9, 2023

Hello,

What would be the ideal way to tune up NWChem driver when configuring a python script for autodE? Something like introducing these lines:

driver
clear
trust xx
maxiter yyy
end

Thanks a lot

E77

@eneas77
Copy link
Author

eneas77 commented Apr 3, 2023

Hi,

Any updates about this?

Thanks

E77

@t-young31
Copy link
Member

Hi! Sorry for missing this – as of autodE v1.3.0 NWChem uses the inbuilt optimisers rather than those available in NWChem, due to my limited success with them (not being able to optimise butane for example..). Unfortunately that means there's no configuration options like you mentioned as the autodE optimisers e.g. crfo have a hard coded values, which is far from ideal. There are issues to improve this e.g. #265 and #262 which should make their way into v1.4.0.

In the mean time if you need to use configurable NWChem it may be best to revert to v1.2, or create an autodE fork and modify those parameters if you're happy diving into the code! hope that's helpful 😄

@shoubhikraj
Copy link
Collaborator

@t-young31 It should be possible to add some extra config options to Config.NWChem to change the optimiser parameters when initialising them if that's okay with you?

@eneas77
Copy link
Author

eneas77 commented Apr 4, 2023

Hi

Please go ahead :-)

Thanks a lot

E77

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants